Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433763›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Prediction of Refractive Error Based on Ultrawide Field Images With Deep Learning Models in Myopia Patients.

Danjuan Yang, Meiyan Li, Weizhen Li, Yunzhe Wang, Lingling Niu, Yang Shen, Xiaoyu Zhang, Bo Fu, Xingtao Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial intelligence in pediatric myopia - a narrative review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Danjuan YangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Meiyan LiEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Weizhen LiSchool of Data Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yunzhe WangShanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lingling NiuEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yang ShenEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoyu ZhangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Bo FuSchool of Data Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xingtao ZhouEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Summary: Ultrawide field fundus images could be applied in deep learning models to predict the refractive error of myopic patients. The predicted error was related to the older age and greater spherical power. Purpose: To explore the possibility of predicting the refractive error of myopic patients by applying deep learning models trained with ultrawide field (UWF) images. Methods: UWF fundus images were collected from left eyes of 987 myopia patients of Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University between November 2015 and January 2019. The fundus images were all captured with Optomap Daytona, a 200° UWF imaging device. Three deep learning models (ResNet-50, Inception-v3, Inception-ResNet-v2) were trained with the UWF images for predicting refractive error. 133 UWF fundus images were also collected after January 2021 as an the external validation data set. The predicted refractive error was compared with the "true value" measured by subjective refraction. Mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and coefficient ( Results: ResNet-50, Inception-v3 and Inception-ResNet-v2 models were trained with the UWF images for refractive error prediction with Conclusions: It was feasible to predict refractive error in myopic patients with deep learning models trained by UWF images with the accuracy to be improved.

Indexed as

deep learningInception-ResNet-v2Inception-V3myopiarefractive error predictionResNet-50ultrawide field imaging

Identifiers

PMID35433763
PMCPMC9007166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.