Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433758›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2022

Enhancement of Online Education to the Teaching Paradigm: Taking Academic Medical Postgraduate Cultivation as an Example.

Bin Su

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bin SuBeijing Key Laboratory for HIV/AIDS Research, Clinical and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing YouAn Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic posed enormous challenges to postgraduate teaching in 2020. Large-scale and continuous online teaching explorations were introduced to cope with this difficult situation, which incidentally shifted the paradigm of postgraduate teaching. Purpose: A review of the online teaching of local medical schools for postgraduates was performed to identify the success factors in realizing the practice. Methods: We retrieved medical postgraduate online teaching publications mainly from the local database, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Results: We analyzed key success factors in improving online learning engagement that were considered exclusive to offline classroom teaching, including emotional interaction, the immediacy of communication, and enthusiasm for participation. With these positive effects, the integration of online and offline teaching advantages is beneficial for the initiative of academic medical postgraduates and promotes the construction and development of medical postgraduate education. Conclusion: Online education can overcome the limitations of time, space, and teaching frequency, with great advantages in terms of flexibility and mobility over traditional classroom teaching. It can effectively cope with difficulties in the education of academic medical postgraduates in challenging times. In the post-pandemic era, blended online and offline teaching approaches continue and will become the new normal pedagogy for the training of medical postgraduate students.

Indexed as

academic medical postgraduatesmedical educationmulti-dimensional teaching modeonline educationpostgraduate training

Identifiers

PMID35433758
PMCPMC9006041
OpenAlexW4220678360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.