Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433552›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Improving Pediatric/Neonatology Residents' Newborn Resuscitation Skills With a Digital Serious Game: DIANA.

Serena Bardelli, Giulio Del Corso, Massimiliano Ciantelli, Marta Del Pistoia, Francesca Lorenzoni, Nicoletta Fossati, Rosa T Scaramuzzo, Armando Cuttano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Serena BardelliCentro di Formazione e Simulazione Neonatale "NINA," U.O. Neonatologia, Dipartimento Materno-Infantile, AOUP, Pisa, Italy.
Giulio Del CorsoDepartment of Mathematics, Gran Sasso Science Institute (GSSI), L'Aquila, Italy.
Massimiliano CiantelliCentro di Formazione e Simulazione Neonatale "NINA," U.O. Neonatologia, Dipartimento Materno-Infantile, AOUP, Pisa, Italy.
Marta Del PistoiaCentro di Formazione e Simulazione Neonatale "NINA," U.O. Neonatologia, Dipartimento Materno-Infantile, AOUP, Pisa, Italy.
Francesca LorenzoniCentro di Formazione e Simulazione Neonatale "NINA," U.O. Neonatologia, Dipartimento Materno-Infantile, AOUP, Pisa, Italy.
Nicoletta FossatiInstitute of Medical and Biomedical Education, Faculty of Medicine, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Rosa T ScaramuzzoCentro di Formazione e Simulazione Neonatale "NINA," U.O. Neonatologia, Dipartimento Materno-Infantile, AOUP, Pisa, Italy.
Armando CuttanoCentro di Formazione e Simulazione Neonatale "NINA," U.O. Neonatologia, Dipartimento Materno-Infantile, AOUP, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Serious games, and especially digital game based learning (DGBL) methodologies, have the potential to strengthen classic learning methodology in all medical procedures characterized by a flowchart (e.g., neonatal resuscitation algorithm). However, few studies have compared short- and long-term knowledge retention in DGBL methodologies with a control group undergoing specialist training led by experienced operators. In particular, resident doctors' learning still has limited representation in simulation-based education literature. Objective: A serious computer game DIANA ( Methods: Pediatric/neonatology residents of the Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana (AOUP) were invited to take part in the study and were split into a game group or a control group; both groups were homogeneous in terms of previous training and baseline scores. The control group attended a classic 80 min teaching session with a neonatal trainer, while game group participants played four 20 min sessions over four different days. Three written tests (pre/immediately post-training and at 28 days) were used to evaluate and compare the two groups' performances. Results: Forty-eight pediatric/neonatology residents participated in the study. While classic training by a neonatal trainer demonstrated an excellent effectiveness in short/long-term knowledge retention, DGBL methodology proved to be equivalent or better. Furthermore, after each game session, DGBL score improved for both procedure knowledge and ventilation/chest compressions rate. Conclusions: In this study, DGBL was as effective as classic specialist training for neonatal resuscitation in terms of both algorithm memorization and knowledge retention. User appreciation for the methodology and ease of administration, including remotely, support the use of DGBL methodologies for pediatric/neonatology residents education.

Indexed as

DGBLdigital gameshealthcare educationmemory and retentionneonatal resuscitationnewborn infantsserious gametechnology-enhanced training or learning

Identifiers

PMID35433552
PMCPMC9010974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.