Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433548›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Advances in the Study of the Mechanisms of Physiological Root Resorption in Deciduous Teeth.

Manxue Xiao, Hong Qian, Jingwen Lv, Peixuan Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Proteomic analysis of dental pulp from deciduous teeth in comparison to permanent teeth: an in-vitro study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manxue XiaoDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Stomatological Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hong QianDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Stomatological Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jingwen LvDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Stomatological Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Peixuan WangDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Stomatological Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Southern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiological root resorption of deciduous teeth is a complex physiological process that is essential for the normal replacement of deciduous teeth and permanent teeth in clinical practice, but its importance is often overlooked due to the presence of permanent teeth. This physiological process includes not only the resorption of hard tissues of deciduous teeth, such as dentin and cementum, but also the elimination of soft tissues, such as pulp and periodontal ligament (PDL). However, the mechanisms of physiological root resorption are not yet clear. In this article, the advances of research on the mechanisms related to physiological root resorption will be reviewed in two main aspects: hard tissues and soft tissues of deciduous teeth, specifically in relation to the effects of inflammatory microenvironment and mechanical stress on the resorption of hard tissues, the repair of hard tissues, and the elimination and the histological events of soft tissues.

Indexed as

apoptosisdeciduous teethinflammatory microenvironmentmechanical stressphysiological root resorption

Identifiers

PMID35433548
PMCPMC9005890
OpenAlexW4220929564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.