Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433498›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Efficacy of Probiotics for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Tao Zhang, Cunzheng Zhang, Jindong Zhang, Feng Sun, Liping Duan

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Altered molecular signature of the intestinal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome patients versus healthy controls: An updated systematic review.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Probiotics for the treatment of depression and its comorbidities: A systemic review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Safety and Tolerance ofNutrients · 2025
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Viable and Heat-InactivatedMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tao ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Cunzheng ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jindong ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Feng SunChina Center for Evidence Based Medical and Clinical Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Liping DuanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal condition. Studies regarding the treatment of IBS with probiotics have not yielded consistent results, and the best probiotics has not yet been confirmed. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to assess the relative rank order of different probiotics for IBS. Method: We searched for RCTs on the efficacy of probiotics for IBS until August 25, 2021. The primary outcome was the symptom relief rate, as well as global symptoms, abdominal pain, bloating, and straining scores. The NMA was conducted using Stata 15.0. We also used meta-regression to explore whether the treatment length and dose influenced the efficacy. Results: Forty-three RCTs, with 5,531 IBS patients, were included in this analysis. Firstly, we compared the efficacy of different probiotic species. Conclusions: The findings of this NMA suggested that

Indexed as

Irritable Bowel SyndromeProbioticsAbdominal PainHumansQuality of LifeTreatment Outcomeadverse eventsefficacyirritable bowel syndromenetwork meta-analysisprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID35433498
PMCPMC9010660
OpenAlexW4220967172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.