ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Exploring Histological Similarities Across Cancers From a Deep Learning Perspective.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- His-MMDM: Multi-Domain and Multi-Omics Translation of Histopathological Images with Diffusion Models.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Segmentation of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas: Introducing DRU-Net and Multi-Lens Distortion.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Review
- Recent advances of pathomics in colorectal cancer diagnosis and prognosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Histopathology image analysis is widely accepted as a gold standard for cancer diagnosis. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) contains large repositories of histopathology whole slide images spanning several organs and subtypes. However, not much work has gone into analyzing all the organs and subtypes and their similarities. Our work attempts to bridge this gap by training deep learning models to classify cancer vs. normal patches for 11 subtypes spanning seven organs (9,792 tissue slides) to achieve high classification performance. We used these models to investigate their performances in the test set of other organs (cross-organ inference). We found that every model had a good cross-organ inference accuracy when tested on breast, colorectal, and liver cancers. Further, high accuracy is observed between models trained on the cancer subtypes originating from the same organ (kidney and lung). We also validated these performances by showing the separability of cancer and normal samples in a high-dimensional feature space. We further hypothesized that the high cross-organ inferences are due to shared tumor morphologies among organs. We validated the hypothesis by showing the overlap in the Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (GradCAM) visualizations and similarities in the distributions of nuclei features present within the high-attention regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.