Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433487›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Identification of LncRNA Prognostic Signature Associated With Genomic Instability in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Jinfeng Zhu, Qian Huang, Xingyu Peng, Chen Luo, Sicheng Liu, Zitao Liu, Xun Wu, Hongliang Luo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cuproptosis-Related lncRNA Predict Prognosis and Immune Response of LUAD.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jinfeng ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Qian HuangDepartment of General Practice, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xingyu PengDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Chen LuoDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Sicheng LiuDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zitao LiuDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xun WuDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Hongliang LuoDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CNNanchang University · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Genomic instability (GI) is a critical feature of cancer which plays a key role in the occurrence and development of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD). Long non-coding RNA (LncRNA) is an emerging prognostic biomarker because it is involved in regulating GI. Recently, researchers used such GI-related LncRNAs (GILncRNAs) to establish a prognostic signature for patients with cancer and helped in predicting the overall prognosis of the patients. However, it is evident that patients with PAAD still lack such prognostic signature constructed with GILncRNA. Methods: The present study screened GILncRNAs from 83 patients with PAAD. Prognosis-related GILncRNAs were identified by univariate Cox regression analysis. The correlation coefficients of these GILncRNAs were obtained by multivariate Cox regression analysis and used to construct a signature. The signature in the present study was then assessed through survival analysis, mutation correlation analysis, independent prognostic analysis, and clinical stratification analysis in the training set and validated in the testing as well as all TCGA set. The current study performed external clinical relevance validation of the signature and validated the effect of AC108134.2 in GILncSig on PAAD using Results: Results of the present study found that a total of 409 GILncRNAs were identified, 5 of which constituted the prognostic risk signature in this study, namely, AC095057.3, AC108134.2, AC124798.1, AL606834.1, and AC104695.4. It was found that the signature of the present study was better than others in predicting the overall survival and applied to patients with PAAD of all ages, genders, and tumor grades. Further, it was noted that the signature of the current study in the GSE102238, was correlated with tumor length, and tumor stage of patients with PAAD. Conclusions: In conclusion, it was evident that the GILncSig used in the present study has good prognostic performance. Therefore, the signature may become a potential sensitive biological indicator of PAAD chemotherapy, which may help in clinical decision-making and management of patients with cancer.

Indexed as

chemosensitivitygenomic instabilitylong non-coding RNApancreatic adenocarcinomaprognosissignature

Identifiers

PMID35433487
PMCPMC9012103
OpenAlexW4221103578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.