Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433457›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Rationale for Utilization of Hydrogel Rectal Spacers in Dose Escalated SBRT for the Treatment of Unfavorable Risk Prostate Cancer.

Michael C Repka, Michael Creswell, Jonathan W Lischalk, Michael Carrasquilla, Matthew Forsthoefel, Jacqueline Lee, Siyuan Lei, Nima Aghdam, Shaan Kataria, Olusola Obayomi-Davies and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Role of rectal spacers in gynecological cancer radiotherapy: reducing rectal dose and treatment-related toxicity.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Michael C RepkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Michael CreswellGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States.
Jonathan W LischalkDepartment of Radiation Oncology at New York University (NYU) Long Island School of Medicine, Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYCyberKnife, New York, NY, United States.
Michael CarrasquillaDepartment of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Matthew ForsthoefelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapy Centers of Kentuckiana, Louisville, KY, United States.
Jacqueline LeeGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States.
Siyuan LeiDepartment of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Nima AghdamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Shaan KatariaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Arlington & Reston Radiation Oncology, Arlington, VA, United States.
Olusola Obayomi-DaviesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wellstar Kennestone Hospital, Marietta, GA, United States.
Brian T CollinsDepartment of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Simeng SuyDepartment of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Ryan A HankinsDepartment of Urology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Sean P CollinsDepartment of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital · USGeorgetown University · USAmerican Society for Radiation Oncology · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USKentuckiana Pulmonary Associates · USNew York University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWellStar Kennestone Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review we outline the current evidence for the use of hydrogel rectal spacers in the treatment paradigm for prostate cancer with external beam radiation therapy. We review their development, summarize clinical evidence, risk of adverse events, best practices for placement, treatment planning considerations and finally we outline a framework and rationale for the utilization of rectal spacers when treating unfavorable risk prostate cancer with dose escalated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT).

Indexed as

hydrogelprostateradiation therapyradiotherapyrectal spacerSBRT

Identifiers

PMID35433457
PMCPMC9008358
OpenAlexW4221121305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.