SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022
Association Between Endometriosis and Prognosis of Ovarian Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Primary Carcinomas of the Episiotomy Scar Site: A Systematic Literature Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Pooled it
- Histologic Subtypes in Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Arising in Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Review
- Association between endometriosis and prognosis of ovarian clear cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- Clinicopathological Characteristics and Oncologic Outcomes of Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Cancer Centre.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Deep infiltrating endometriosis: retroperitoneal endometriosis-a case report.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Endometriosis: Future Biological Perspectives for Diagnosis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Endometriosis-Related Ovarian Cancers: Evidence for a Dichotomy in the Histogenesis of the Two Associated Histotypes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Endometriosis in clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma ovary: its impact on clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes.Ecancermedicalscience · 2023Article
- Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer: What Are the Implications for Women with Intact Endometrioma Planning for a Future Pregnancy? A Reproductive Clinical Outlook.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- History of Endometriosis Is Independently Associated with an Increased Risk of Ovarian Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Increased risk of ovarian cancer (OC) among endometriosis patients has been proposed. However, the association between endometriosis and prognosis of OC remains controversial. This study evaluated whether endometriosis had influence on the survival outcomes of OC through a meta-analysis. Methods: Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases and were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Effect size was presented as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity test evaluation was performed using Cochran's Q test and I Results: Twenty-one studies involving 38641 patients were included. For the total OC, there were significant differences in overall survival (OS) [HR (95% CI)=0.67 (0.55, 0.80), P<0.001] and progression-free survival (PFS) [HR (95% CI)=0.58 (0.42, 0.81), P=0.001] between endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) and non-EAOC patients in the random-effects models (P<0.05). For ovarian clear cell cancer, there were significant differences in terms of OS [HR (95% CI)=0.63 (0.48, 0.83), P=0.001] and PFS [HR (95% CI)=0.67 (0.52, 0.87), P=0.002] between EAOC and non-EAOC patients in the fixed-effects models (P>0.05). Subgroup analysis suggested no significant differences between EAOC and non-EAOC in OS and PFS in the univariate analysis per subgroup, and PFS in the American subgroup (P>0.05). Conclusion: EAOC patients tended to have better OS and PFS than non-EAOC patients. Conducting higher quality prospective cohort studies with large sample sizes is recommended to confirm the authenticity of the current study's results. Systematic Review Registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-3-0109/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.