Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433423›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Regorafenib in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.

Donghao Xu, Yu Liu, Wentao Tang, Lingsha Xu, Tianyu Liu, Yudong Jiang, Shizhao Zhou, Xiaorui Qin, Jisheng Li, Jiemin Zhao and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Donghao XuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yu LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wentao TangDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lingsha XuDepartment of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Tianyu LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yudong JiangDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shizhao ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaorui QinDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jisheng LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jiemin ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Lechi YeDepartment of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Wenju ChangDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jianmin XuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNFudan University · CNZhongshan Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNSoochow University · CNWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Regorafenib improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Here, we report the treatment patterns of regorafenib in the third- or late-line setting for mCRC in four centers in China. Patients and Methods: Patients with refractory mCRC in four centers in China administered regorafenib from February 1, 2018 to June 31, 2021 were enrolled. Patients were grouped into 3 cohorts, namely, the monotherapy (regorafenib alone), chemo (regorafenib plus chemotherapy), and immune [regorafenib plus anti-PD1 (programmed cell death 1) antibodies] groups. Demographic, clinical, survival and safety data were retrospectively analyzed. Results: A total of 177 patients were included in this study. Of them, 116 (65.5%) were treated with regorafenib alone, while 28 (15.9%) and 33 (18.6%) were administered regorafenib plus chemotherapy and anti-PD1 antibodies, respectively. The median followed-up time was 9.2 months. The disease control rate (DCR) was 40.7%. The median PFS (mPFS) was 2.43 months and the median OS (mOS) was 12.2 months. The immune group had longer median PFS (3.5 m vs. 2.2 m, p = 0.043) compared with the monotherapy group. Patients administered regorafenib plus chemotherapy had longer median OS (15.9 m vs. 8.4 m, p = 0.032) compared with the monotherapy group. Patients who began regorafenib treatment at 120 mg had longer median PFS and OS compared with those who began at 80 mg (PFS: 3.7 m vs. 2.0 m; p <0.001; OS: 13.4 m vs. 10.2 m; p = 0.005). Patients with a final dose of 120 mg had longer median PFS and OS compared with the 80 mg or less group (PFS: 5.0 m vs. 2.3 m; p = 0.045; OS: UR (unreach) vs. 10.9 m; p = 0.003). There were 87.0% (154/177) patients who experienced AEs. Three groups had similar rates of AEs (86.2% vs. 89.3% vs. 87.9%; p = 0.89). Conclusion: Patients administered regorafenib alone or regorafenib in combination with other agents were relieved to some extent, with a disease control rate of 40.7%. Regorafenib plus anti-PD1 antibodies showed better PFS, while regorafenib plus chemotherapy had the most benefit in OS. There was no significant difference among three groups in terms of AEs.

Indexed as

chemotherapycolorectal cancerimmune therapyregorafenibsalvage treatment

Identifiers

PMID35433423
PMCPMC9007238
OpenAlexW4220905961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.