ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Rapidly Progressive Classic Adamantinoma of the Spine: Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of Tibial Adamantinoma: Balancing Oncologic Cure and Reconstructive Longevity.Cureus · 2026Review
- Rare Case of Recurrent Adamantinoma of the Tibia: Limited Efficacy of Pazopanib as a Standalone Treatment.The American journal of case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adamantinoma is a locally aggressive or malignant tumor, accounting for <0.5% of all primary bone tumors. The tumor usually progresses slowly, with a relatively promising prognosis. Primary or metastatic spinal adamantinoma of bone are rarer. Only four cases have been documented till date. We present two cases of aggressive spinal adamantinoma whose microphotography and radiographic appearance were unusual, with extensive involvement of multiple segments and rapid progression. Case 1 was a 36-year-old woman, presenting with back pain, progressive numbness and motor weakness, who was diagnosed with metastatic adamantinoma in the T2, T7, L2, and L4. She underwent spondylectomy three times to resect these lesions, respectively. Case 2 was a 68-year-old male with complaints of severe left back pain. MRI revealed destructive changes in T1-T4. He underwent posterior decompression (T1-T3), partial vertebrectomy (T2), fixation and fusion (C5-C7, T4-T6). The pathology of two patients was metastatic spinal adamantinoma, whose primary lesions were from tibia and femoral adamantinoma, respectively. Rapid squamous progression was observed in specimens of T2 and T7 lesions of Case 1 in two months. Twenty-five months after surgery, Case 1 developed paralysis, but she refused to receive further examination and treatment. Two months after surgery, Case 2 presented with an upper back pain again. The MRI revealed an increase in osseous destruction and paravertebral mass size. He was administered radiotherapy, with his upper back pain partially relieved. The biological behavior of classic adamantinoma is highly unpredictable, often exhibiting more aggressive behavior upon recurrence or metastasis. The pathological diagnosis of adamantinoma should be confirmed by preoperative biopsy. En bloc resection with a wide margin is the preferred treatment for primary spinal adamantinoma. Radiation therapy can partially relieve the pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.