Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433408›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Prognostic Effect of Age in Resected Pancreatic Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Yaolin Xu, Yueming Zhang, Siyang Han, Dayong Jin, Xuefeng Xu, Tiantao Kuang, Wenchuan Wu, Dansong Wang, Wenhui Lou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yaolin XuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yueming ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Siyang HanDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Dayong JinDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xuefeng XuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Tiantao KuangDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wenchuan WuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Dansong WangDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wenhui LouDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNFudan University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNZhongshan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While the elderly population account for an indispensable proportion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), these patients are underrepresented in clinical trials. Whether surgery offered the same benefit for elderly patients as that for younger cohort and which factors affected long-term outcome of elderly population remained unclear. Aims: This study aims to evaluate long-term prognosis of elderly PDAC patients (≥70 years old) after surgery and to investigate potential prognostic factors. Methods: This retrospective study included PDAC patients receiving radical resection from January 2012 to July 2019 in Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University. Patients were divided into young (<70) and old groups (≥70). Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to eliminate the confounding factors. We investigated potential prognostic factors Results: A total of 552 PDAC patients who received radical resection were included in this research. Elderly patients showed poorer nutritional status and were less likely to received adjuvant treatment. After matching, although age [hazard ratio (HR)=1.025, 95%CI 0.997-1.054; p=0.083] was not statistically significant in the multivariate cox regression analysis, further survival analysis showed that patients in the old group had poorer overall survival (OS) when compared with young group (p=0.039). Furthermore, reception of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.411, 95%CI 0.201-0.837; p=0.014) was the only independent prognostic factor among elderly patients and could significantly improve OS. Subgroup analysis indicated that age had better prognostic value in PDAC patients with good preoperative nutritional status and relative low tumor burden. Finally, a prognostic prediction model contained age, reception of adjuvant chemotherapy, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th T and N stage was constructed and presented in nomogram, whose Harrell's concordance index was 0.7478 (95%CI, 0.6960-0.7996). The calibration curves at 1 and 3 years indicated an optimal conformity between actual and nomogram-predicted survival probability in the PDAC patient who received surgery. Conclusion: The elderly PDAC patients were associated with worse OS survival after radical resection, and the noticeable negative effect of age was observed among PDAC patients with better preoperative nutritional status and less aggressive tumor biology. Adjuvant chemotherapy was essential to improve survival outcome of elderly PDAC patients following radical resection.

Indexed as

adjuvant chemotherapypancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaprognosisradical resectionthe elderly patients

Identifiers

PMID35433408
PMCPMC9008824
OpenAlexW4220749266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.