ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2022
Ultrasound-Guided Clavipectoral Block for Postoperative Analgesia of Clavicular Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06905249 (Midclavicle Block), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Midclavicle Block: A Clinical Observational Study
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clavipectoral fascia block associated with intermediate cervical plexus block versus intermediate cervical plexus block alone in clavicle surgeries: a randomized clinical trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Prospective Evaluation of Clavicle Fracture Osteosynthesis: Patient Satisfaction, Clinical, and Radiological Outcomes with Clavipectoral Fascial Plane Block.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of clavipectoral fascial plane block for analgesia in clavicle fracture operations: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia in Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: An Observational Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clavicular fractures are commonly encountered in daily practice, and most cases are operated under general surgery. Until now, there has been a debate about the best approach to manage pain in such cases. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate whether ultrasound-guided clavipectoral block [clavipectoral fascial plane block (CPB)] would be safe and effective in cases with clavicular fractures. Methods: This prospective randomized study included a total of 40 patients with clavicular fractures; they were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 included 20 cases who underwent CPB, and group 2 included 20 cases who underwent placebo block. Pain score, duration of analgesia, total analgesic consumption, and procedure-related complications were noted and recorded. Results: Despite the comparable demographic data between the 2 groups, pain scores were significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2, starting from postanesthesia care unit (PACU) admission until 12 hours after the operation. Group 1 showed a significant reduction in 24-hour opioid consumption and significant prolongation of the duration of analgesia compared to the placebo. Patient satisfaction was significantly better in group 1 than in group 2. No block-related adverse events were recorded. Conclusions: CPB is a safe and effective regional technique that should be used for pain management after clavicular fixation surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.