Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433370›Full record

ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2022

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: diagnosis, operability assessment and patient selection for pulmonary endarterectomy.

Tom Verbelen, Laurent Godinas, Geert Maleux, Johan Coolen, Guido Claessen, Catharina Belge, Bart Meyns, Marion Delcroix

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical-radiological-pathological correlation in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tom VerbelenDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Laurent GodinasDepartment of Pneumology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Geert MaleuxDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Johan CoolenDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Guido ClaessenDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Catharina BelgeDepartment of Pneumology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bart MeynsDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Marion DelcroixDepartment of Pneumology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare providers outside pulmonary hypertension (PH) centers having misinformation or insufficient education, and a general lack of treatment awareness contribute to a massive underdiagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), diagnostic delay and refusal of surgery by patients. Together with the subjective operability assessment, this leads to too few patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA); even though this surgery results in improved survival and exercise capacity. Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) survivors should undergo a CTEPH screening strategy. Patients screened positive and those with CTEPH symptoms (with or without history of PE), should undergo transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to determine the probability of PH. High PH probability patients should undergo a ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan. A negative scan rules out CTEPH. Patients with a positive V/Q scan, but also patients with findings suggestive for CTEPH on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) to diagnose acute PE, should be referred to a CTEPH center. Further diagnostic work-up currently consists of catheter based pulmonary angiography, CTPA and right heart catheterization. However, new imaging technologies might replace them in the near future, with one single imaging tool to screen, diagnose and assess operability as the ultimate goal. Operability assessment should be performed by a multidisciplinary CTEPH team. PEA surgery should be organized in a single center per country or for each forty to fifty million inhabitants in order to offer the highest level of expertise. Informing patients about PEA should preferably be done by the treating surgeon. Based on the estimated incidence of CTEPH and with a better education of patients and healthcare providers, despite the advent of new interventional and medical therapies for CTEPH, the number of PEA surgeries performed should still have the potential to grow significantly.

Indexed as

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)diagnosisoperabilitypatient selectionpulmonary endarterectomy (PEA)

Identifiers

PMID35433370
PMCPMC9012197
OpenAlexW3212351571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.