Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433350›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2022

Impact of coronary plaque morphology on the precision of computational fractional flow reserve derived from optical coherence tomography imaging.

Xiaoling Zeng, Emil Nielsen Holck, Jelmer Westra, Fukang Hu, Jiayue Huang, Hiroki Emori, Takashi Kubo, William Wijns, Lianglong Chen, Shengxian Tu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaoling ZengDepartment of Cardiology, Fujian Heart Medical Centre, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Emil Nielsen HolckDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jelmer WestraDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Fukang HuBiomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jiayue HuangThe Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine and Curam, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Hiroki EmoriDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Takashi KuboDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
William WijnsThe Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine and Curam, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Lianglong ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Fujian Heart Medical Centre, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Shengxian TuDepartment of Cardiology, Fujian Heart Medical Centre, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Computational fractional flow reserve (FFR) was recently developed to expand the use of physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Nevertheless, current methods do not account for plaque composition. It remains unknown whether the numerical precision of computational FFR is impacted by the plaque composition in the interrogated vessels. Methods: This study is an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study. Patients who underwent both optical coherence tomography (OCT) and FFR prior to intervention between August 2011 and October 2018 at Wakayama Medical University Hospital were included. All frames from OCT pullbacks were analyzed using a deep learning algorithm to obtain coronary plaque morphology including thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA), lipidic plaque volume (LPV), fibrous plaque volume (FPV), and calcific plaque volume (CPV). The interrogated vessels were stratified into three subgroups: the overestimation group with the numerical difference between the optical flow ratio (OFR) and FFR >0.05, the reference group with the difference ≥-0.05 and ≤0.05, and the underestimation group with the difference <-0.05. Results: In total 230 vessels with intermediate coronary artery stenosis from 193 patients were analyzed. The mean FFR was 0.82±0.10. Among them, 21, 179, and 30 vessels were in the overestimation, the reference, and the underestimation group, respectively. TCFA was higher in the underestimation group (60%) compared with reference (36.3%) and overestimation group (19%). Besides, it was not associated with numerical difference between OFR and FFR (NDOF) after multilevel linear regression. LPV was associated with NDOF as OFR underestimated FFR with -0.028 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.047, -0.009] for every 100 mm Conclusions: High lipid burden underestimates FFR when OFR is used to assess the hemodynamic importance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis. TCFA, FPV, and CPV were not independent predictors of NDOF.

Indexed as

Atherosclerosiscoronary physiologycoronary plaque morphologyfractional flow reserve (FFR)optical coherence tomography (OCT)

Identifiers

PMID35433350
PMCPMC9011092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.