Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433303›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical pediatrics2022

Prevalence of intellectual disability in India: A meta-analysis.

Paul Swamidhas Sudhakar Russell, Sahana Nagaraj, Ashvini Vengadavaradan, Sushila Russell, Priya Mary Mammen, Satya Raj Shankar, Shonima Aynipully Viswanathan, Richa Earnest, Swetha Madhuri Chikkala, Grace Rebekah

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dental service utilisation and perceptions amongst Indian rural children with intellectual and developmental disabilities.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul Swamidhas Sudhakar RussellChild and Adolescent Psychiatry Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632 002, Tamil Nadu, India. russell@cmcvellore.ac.in.
Sahana NagarajChild and Adolescent Psychiatry Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632 002, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ashvini VengadavaradanChild and Adolescent Psychiatry Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632 002, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sushila RussellChild and Adolescent Psychiatry Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632 002, Tamil Nadu, India.
Priya Mary MammenChild and Adolescent Psychiatry Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632 002, Tamil Nadu, India.
Satya Raj ShankarChild and Adolescent Psychiatry Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632 002, Tamil Nadu, India.
Shonima Aynipully ViswanathanChild and Adolescent Psychiatry Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632 002, Tamil Nadu, India.
Richa EarnestDepartment of Psychiatry, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632 002, Tamil Nadu, India.
Swetha Madhuri ChikkalaChild and Adolescent Psychiatry Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632 002, Tamil Nadu, India.
Grace RebekahDepartment of Biostatistic, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632 002, Tamil Nadu, India.
Christian Medical College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBurden due to intellectual disability (ID) is only third to the depressive disorders and anxiety disorders in India. This national burden significantly contributes to the global burden of ID and hence one has to think globally and act locally to reduce this burden. At its best the collective prevalence of ID is in the form of narrative reviews. There is an urgent need to document the summary prevalence of ID to enhance further policymaking, national programs and resource allocation.

aimTo establish the summary prevalence of ID during the past 60 years in India.

methodsTwo researchers independently and electronically searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane library from January 1961 to December 2020 using appropriate search terms. Two other investigators extracted the study design, setting, participant characteristics, and measures used to identify ID. Two other researchers appraised the quality of the studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal format for Prevalence Studies. Funnel plot and Egger's regression test were used to ascertain the publication and small study effect on the prevalence. To evaluate the summary prevalence of ID, we used the random effects model with arcsine square-root transformation. Heterogeneity of

resultsNineteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was publication bias; the trim-and-fill method was used to further ascertain bias. Concerns with control of confounders and the reliable measure of outcome were noted in the critical appraisal. The summary prevalence of ID was 2% [(95%CI: 2%, 3%);

conclusionThe summary prevalence of ID in India was established to be 2% taking into consideration the individual prevalence studies over the last six decades. This knowledge should improve the existing disability and mental health policies, national programs and service delivery to reduce the national and global burden associated with ID.

Indexed as

Children and adolescentsIndiaIntellectual disabilityMeta-analysisPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID35433303
PMCPMC8985497
OpenAlexW4220728332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.