Observational studyAnnals of global health2022
Spatial Estimation of PM
Observational study in Annals of global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Restrictive Lung Function Patterns and Sex Differences in Primary School Children Exposed to PM2.5 in Chiang Mai, Northern Thailand.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Clean Air for Asthma and Allergy Programme (CAAP), a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of multicomponent interventions to reduce indoor triggers in childhood asthma.Asia Pacific allergy · 2025Article
- The impact of short-term exposure to black carbon air pollution on asthma exacerbations in Thai children: a time-stratified case-crossover nationwide study from 2015 to 2022.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Peaks, sources, and immediate health impacts of PMJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025Article
- Public Health Impacts of Ambient Particulate Matter Pollution in Libya from 1990 to 2019: An Analysis of the 2019 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- The Influence of Fine Particulate Matter and Cold Weather on Emergency Room Interventions for Childhood Asthma.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Prediction of Asthma Exacerbations in Children.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Perspective on Particulate Matter: From Biomass Burning to the Health Crisis in Mainland Southeast Asia.Toxics · 2023Review
- Spatial Epidemiological Analysis of Keshan Disease in China.Annals of global health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The acceptable fine particulate matter (PM Objective: To study the association between PM Methods: A pilot prospective observational study was conducted at the Chest and Allergy clinic at Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok and at the Chest Clinic at Nakornping Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand, from June 2020 to February 2021. Children with asthma, aged 5-18 years old, were recruited. Respiratory symptoms, including cough, chest tightness, dyspnea or wheezing, peak expiratory flow rate, and asthma exacerbation, were recorded twice daily by caregivers. Estimated average daily PM Findings: Seventy asthmatic patients were enrolled. The median age was 9.7 (IQR 5-18) years old. There were 53 respiratory symptoms, 5 admissions, and 1 intensive care unit admission. Daily PM Conclusions: Our findings suggest that asthmatic children are sensitive to daily PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.