Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433208›Full record

ReviewEndoscopy international open2022

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastroenterostomy for the management of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anand Kumar, Saurabh Chandan, Babu P Mohan, Pradeep R Atla, Evin J McCabe, David H Robbins, Arvind J Trindade, Petros C Benias

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopy international open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy with wire endoscopic simplified technique: Move towards benign indications (with video).Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anand KumarDivision of Gastroenterology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, United States.
Saurabh ChandanDivision of Gastroenterology, CHI Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States.
Babu P MohanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.
Pradeep R AtlaPalmdale Regional Medical Center, Palmdale, California, United States.
Evin J McCabeDivision of Gastroenterology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, United States.
David H RobbinsDivision of Gastroenterology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, United States.
Arvind J TrindadeDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, United States.
Petros C BeniasDivision of Gastroenterology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, United States.
Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell · USCHI Health Creighton University Medical Center - Bergan Mercy · USLenox Hill Hospital · USNorth Shore University Hospital · USRegional Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID35433208
PMCPMC9010090
OpenAlexW4224054505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.