Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433167›Full record

Review3 Biotech2022

Deep learning tools for advancing drug discovery and development.

Sagorika Nag, Anurag T K Baidya, Abhimanyu Mandal, Alen T Mathew, Bhanuranjan Das, Bharti Devi, Rajnish Kumar

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in 3 Biotech, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
22.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. AI-drivenPeerJ · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sagorika NagDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (B.H.U.), Varanasi, UP 221005 India.
Anurag T K BaidyaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (B.H.U.), Varanasi, UP 221005 India.
Abhimanyu MandalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (B.H.U.), Varanasi, UP 221005 India.
Alen T MathewDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (B.H.U.), Varanasi, UP 221005 India.
Bhanuranjan DasDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (B.H.U.), Varanasi, UP 221005 India.
Bharti DeviDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (B.H.U.), Varanasi, UP 221005 India.
Rajnish KumarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (B.H.U.), Varanasi, UP 221005 India.ORCID 0000-0002-7021-6996
Indian Institute of Technology BHU · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A few decades ago, drug discovery and development were limited to a bunch of medicinal chemists working in a lab with enormous amount of testing, validations, and synthetic procedures, all contributing to considerable investments in time and wealth to get one drug out into the clinics. The advancements in computational techniques combined with a boom in multi-omics data led to the development of various bioinformatics/pharmacoinformatics/cheminformatics tools that have helped speed up the drug development process. But with the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), the conventional drug discovery process has been further rationalized. Extensive biological data in the form of big data present in various databases across the globe acts as the raw materials for the ML/DL-based approaches and helps in accurate identifications of patterns and models which can be used to identify therapeutically active molecules with much fewer investments on time, workforce and wealth. In this review, we have begun by introducing the general concepts in the drug discovery pipeline, followed by an outline of the fields in the drug discovery process where ML/DL can be utilized. We have also introduced ML and DL along with their applications, various learning methods, and training models used to develop the ML/DL-based algorithms. Furthermore, we have summarized various DL-based tools existing in the public domain with their application in the drug discovery paradigm which includes DL tools for identification of drug targets and drug-target interaction such as DeepCPI, DeepDTA, WideDTA, PADME DeepAffinity, and DeepPocket. Additionally, we have discussed various DL-based models used in protein structure prediction, de novo design of new chemical scaffolds, virtual screening of chemical libraries for hit identification, absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) prediction, metabolite prediction, clinical trial design, and oral bioavailability prediction. In the end, we have tried to shed light on some of the successful ML/DL-based models used in the drug discovery and development pipeline while also discussing the current challenges and prospects of the application of DL tools in drug discovery and development. We believe that this review will be useful for medicinal and computational chemists searching for DL tools for use in their drug discovery projects.

Indexed as

ADMETDeep learningDrug developmentDrug discoveryHit identificationLead optimizationProperty predictionVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID35433167
PMCPMC8994527
OpenAlexW4224279656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.