ArticleCurrent physical medicine and rehabilitation reports2022
Blood Biomarkers in Brain Injury Medicine.
Article in Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-dimensional plasma proteomic profiling elucidates molecular mechanisms and pathophysiological networks in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Article
- The Prognostic Role of Candidate Serum Biomarkers in the Post-Acute and Chronic Phases of Disorder of Consciousness: A Preliminary Study.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Blood-Based Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review With Implications for the Legal System.Cureus · 2023Review
- Neuroinflammatory Biomarkers for Traumatic Brain Injury Diagnosis and Prognosis: A TRACK-TBI Pilot Study.Neurotrauma reports · 2023Article
- The evolving role of extracellular vesicles (exosomes) as biomarkers in traumatic brain injury: Clinical perspectives and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of Review: This review seeks to explore blood-based biomarkers with the potential for clinical implementation. Recent Findings: Emerging non-proteomic biomarkers hold promise for more accurate diagnostic and prognostic capabilities, especially in the subacute to chronic phase of TBI recovery. Further, there is a growing understanding of the overlap between TBI-related and Dementia-related blood biomarkers. Summary: Given the significant heterogeneity inherent in the clinical diagnosis of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), there has been an exponential increase in TBI-related biomarker research over the past two decades. While TBI-related biomarker assessments include both cerebrospinal fluid analysis and advanced neuroimaging modalities, blood-based biomarkers hold the most promise to be non-invasive biomarkers widely available to Brain Injury Medicine clinicians in diverse practice settings. In this article, we review the most relevant blood biomarkers for the field of Brain Injury Medicine, including both proteomic and non-proteomic blood biomarkers, biomarkers of cerebral microvascular injury, and biomarkers that overlap between TBI and Dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.