ArticleDigital health
A bibliometric analysis on global eHealth.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The evolution of digital health: a global, Latin American, and Brazilian bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Development of a Digital Health Literacy Assessment Framework for Older Adults: Delphi-Based Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Bibliometric analysis reveals the current status and future trends of cancer associated photodynamic therapy in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Hotspots and frontiers in global digital literacy: A bibliometric analysis (2000-2023).Medicine · 2025Article
- Multidisciplinary Contributions and Research Trends in eHealth Scholarship (2000-2024): Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The Impact of e-Health Literacy on Risk Perception Among University Students.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bibliometric and visual assessment of research trends in the management of hyperuricemia (HUA).Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Provision of Digital Primary Health Care Services: Overview of Reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
- Impact of eHealth education to reduce anemia among school-going adolescent girls in rural Bangladesh: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023Article
- Global Trends and Hotspots on Microglia Associated with Pain from 2002 to 2022: A Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- Digital Health Literacy: Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Insight into global research on health literacy and heart diseases: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Qualitative study on the characteristics and dilemmas of eHealth literacy among family caregivers of breast cancer patients.Digital healthArticle
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic highlights the potential of eHealth. Drawing the knowledge map of eHealth research through data mining and visual analysis technology was helpful to systematically present the research status and future trends of global academic circles. Methods: Based on the web of Science Core Collection (SCIE/SSCI) database, using bibliometric theory and visual analysis technology, this work analyzed the global eHealth research publications from 2000 to 2021, and introduced the interdisciplinary characteristics, hot topics and future trends in this field. Results: A total of 10188 authors, 891 journals, 3586 institutions, 98 countries using 12 languages had conducted eHealth research in the world. The United States, the Netherlands, Australia and the United Kingdom were the main forces and international cooperation. However, the international co-operation between Eastern and Western countries was still relatively few. The frontier of global eHealth research mainly focused on #0eHealth innovation, #1physical activity, #2generalised anxiety disorder, #3lightweight authentication protocol, #4 eHealth information, #5technology readiness, #6 ehealth literacy scale, #7family carer, #8citance analysis, #9 guiding patient. Clusters #3 lightweight authentication protocol and #9 guiding patient were the latest clusters, indicating the research trend and direction of eHealth in the future. Conclusions: Cooperation network framework at the regional, national and global levels and the cooperation of multidisciplinary teams with complementary backgrounds and expertise were needed to realize the in-depth popularization and application of eHealth knowledge. Interdisciplinary international cooperation should be the trend of eHealth research in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.