Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35433015›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Perspective on digital communication with health professions from close supporters of young people with long-term health conditions (The LYNC Study).

Ayako Temple, Kathryn Hamilton, Carol Bryce, Frances Griffiths, Jackie Sturt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ayako TempleFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8094-1350
Kathryn HamiltonDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Hunter Street Health Centre, London, UK.
Carol BryceWarwick Medical School - Social Science and Systems in Health, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Frances GriffithsWarwick Medical School - Social Science and Systems in Health, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4173-1438
Jackie SturtFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To understand the impact of digital communication using email and text between young people and their health care team on those in close supporting roles. Methods: Twelve people (nine parents and three partners) of young people with long-term health conditions were interviewed between November 2014 and March 2016. Thematic analysis was performed followed Braun and Clarke's (2006) 6-phase method. Results: Four main themes were identified. Close supporters felt that digital clinical communication was useful for young persons' self-management. As well as young patients, close supporters would also like to have direct access to the clinicians, but it was necessary to build up a trusting relationship between close supporters and clinicians initially. Video appointments were suggested for future digital communication technology. Conclusions: Close supporters were encouraging digital communication for their young person with diabetes. Clinicians should put an emphasis on establishing trusting relationships with both young people and close supporters which would be beneficial for their digital clinical communications.

Indexed as

Chronic diseasedigital communicationdigital healthfamilyqualitative researchyoung people

Identifiers

PMID35433015
PMCPMC9005813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.