Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35432951›Full record

ArticleAgriculture & food security2022

Qualitative evidence for improved caring, feeding and food production practices after nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions in rural Vietnam.

Dai Dinh Nguyen, Sabina Di Prima, Reint Huijzendveld, E Pamela Wright, Dirk Essink, Jacqueline E W Broerse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Agriculture & food security, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dai Dinh Nguyen *Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3718-2453
Sabina Di Prima *Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6075-3958
Reint HuijzendveldFaculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2701-4395
E Pamela WrightGuelph International Health Consulting, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0880-3612
Dirk EssinkAthena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1050-4646
Jacqueline E W BroerseAthena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8478-3422
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLHealth Action International · NLNational Institute of Veterinary Research · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Research on nutrition-sensitive agriculture (NSA) has mostly been aimed at demonstrating its impact on nutrition and explicating underlying pathways, and more rarely at understanding processes and lessons learnt from them. This study aimed to gain insights into the processes that influence behaviour change, contributing to improved caring, feeding and food production practices, using a program theory perspective. It also investigated perceived challenges to the sustainability of interventions and potential solutions, in the context of an NSA program in rural Vietnam. Using a participatory approach, data were gathered on impact pathways and perceived outcomes, on elements of program theory that led to behavioural change, as well as barriers and facilitators. Respondents in semi-structured interviews ( Results: The impact pathways (production-consumption, caring and feeding, and home-grown school feeding) envisaged in the NSA program functioned as intended; synergies were revealed. The increased supply of locally produced nutrient-rich foods not only contributed to the emergence of a promising income sub-pathway but also reinforced synergy with the home-grown school feeding pathway. Improved diets, feeding and caring practices, and school attendance were key outcomes of the program. Successful elements were pathway-specific, such as flexibility in implementing context-appropriate agricultural models. Others, such as benefit-driven motivation and improved knowledge, triggered changes in multiple pathways. Role models, increased self-confidence, and change agents were the main process facilitators. The biggest barrier to both implementation and sustainability was the poor socio-economic conditions of the most disadvantaged households. Conclusions: This study showed the relevance of NSA programs in addressing undernutrition in remote areas by enhancing self-reliance in local communities. The integration of behaviour change activities proved to be a key strategy in the process to enhance the impact of agriculture on nutrition outcomes. Though outcomes and influencing factors are very context-dependent, lessons on what worked and what did not work could inform the design and implementation of effective behaviour change strategies in future NSA programs in Vietnam and elsewhere.

Indexed as

Behaviour changeEthnic minority groupsImpact pathwaysNutrition-sensitive agricultureProcess assessmentRemote areas

Identifiers

PMID35432951
PMCPMC8995131
OpenAlexW4223594789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.