Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35432900›Full record

ArticleChemical science2022

PIGNet: a physics-informed deep learning model toward generalized drug-target interaction predictions.

Seokhyun Moon, Wonho Zhung, Soojung Yang, Jaechang Lim, Woo Youn Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Machine Learning for RNA-Targeting Drug Design.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seokhyun MoonDepartment of Chemistry, KAIST 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu Daejeon 34141 Republic of Korea wooyoun@kaist.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5197-0096
Wonho ZhungDepartment of Chemistry, KAIST 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu Daejeon 34141 Republic of Korea wooyoun@kaist.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7499-2063
Soojung YangDepartment of Chemistry, KAIST 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu Daejeon 34141 Republic of Korea wooyoun@kaist.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3090-0176
Jaechang LimHITS Incorporation 124 Teheran-ro, Gangnam-gu Seoul 06234 Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7342-4283
Woo Youn KimDepartment of Chemistry, KAIST 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu Daejeon 34141 Republic of Korea wooyoun@kaist.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7152-2111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, deep neural network (DNN)-based drug-target interaction (DTI) models were highlighted for their high accuracy with affordable computational costs. Yet, the models' insufficient generalization remains a challenging problem in the practice of

Identifiers

PMID35432900
PMCPMC8966633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.