Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35432873›Full record

ArticleChemical science2022

A reactivity model for oxidative addition to palladium enables quantitative predictions for catalytic cross-coupling reactions.

Jingru Lu, Sofia Donnecke, Irina Paci, David C Leitch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jingru LuDepartment of Chemistry, University of Victoria 3800 Finnerty Rd Victoria BC V8P 5C2 Canada ipaci@uvic.ca dcleitch@uvic.ca.
Sofia DonneckeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Victoria 3800 Finnerty Rd Victoria BC V8P 5C2 Canada ipaci@uvic.ca dcleitch@uvic.ca.
Irina PaciDepartment of Chemistry, University of Victoria 3800 Finnerty Rd Victoria BC V8P 5C2 Canada ipaci@uvic.ca dcleitch@uvic.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2217-3311
David C LeitchDepartment of Chemistry, University of Victoria 3800 Finnerty Rd Victoria BC V8P 5C2 Canada ipaci@uvic.ca dcleitch@uvic.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8726-3318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Making accurate, quantitative predictions of chemical reactivity based on molecular structure is an unsolved problem in chemical synthesis, particularly for complex molecules. We report an approach to reactivity prediction for catalytic reactions based on quantitative structure-reactivity models for a key step common to many catalytic mechanisms. We demonstrate this approach with a mechanistically based model for the oxidative addition of (hetero)aryl electrophiles to palladium(0), which is a key step in myriad catalytic processes. This model links simple molecular descriptors to relative rates of oxidative addition for 79 substrates, including chloride, bromide and triflate leaving groups. Because oxidative addition often controls the rate and/or selectivity of palladium-catalyzed reactions, this model can be used to make quantitative predictions about catalytic reaction outcomes. Demonstrated applications include a multivariate linear model for the initial rate of Sonogashira coupling reactions, and successful site-selectivity predictions for Suzuki, Buchwald-Hartwig, and Stille reactions of multihalogenated substrates relevant to the synthesis of pharmaceuticals and natural products.

Identifiers

PMID35432873
PMCPMC8943861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.