Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35432819›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022

Automated Detection of Infection in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Images Using Convolutional Neural Network.

J Yogapriya, Venkatesan Chandran, M G Sumithra, B Elakkiya, A Shamila Ebenezer, C Suresh Gnana Dhas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J YogapriyaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Kongunadu College of Engineering and Technology, Trichy 621215, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8414-9440
Venkatesan ChandranDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Dr. N.G.P. Institute of Technology, Coimbatore 641048, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6898-7417
M G SumithraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Dr. N.G.P. Institute of Technology, Coimbatore 641048, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0504-2061
B ElakkiyaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vel Tech High Tech Dr. Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala Engineering College, Avadi, Chennai 600062, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0512-2205
A Shamila EbenezerKarunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Karunya Nagar, Coimbatore 641114, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5167-8968
C Suresh Gnana DhasDepartment of Computer Science, Ambo University, Post Box No.: 19, Ambo, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-0283-5699
KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology · INAmbo University · ETKarunya University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A bacterial or bone infection in the feet causes diabetic foot infection (DFI), which results in reddish skin in the wound and surrounding area. DFI is the most prevalent and dangerous type of diabetic mellitus. It will mainly occur in people with heart disease, renal illness, or eye disease. The clinical signs and symptoms of local inflammation are used to diagnose diabetic foot infection. In assessing diabetic foot ulcers, the infection has significant clinical implications in predicting the likelihood of amputation. In this work, a diabetic foot infection network (DFINET) is proposed to assess infection and no infection from diabetic foot ulcer images. A DFINET consists of 22 layers with a unique parallel convolution layer with ReLU, a normalization layer, and a fully connected layer with a dropout connection. Experiments have shown that the DFINET, when combined with this technique and improved image augmentation, should yield promising results in infection recognition, with an accuracy of 91.98%, and a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.84 on binary classification. Such enhancements to existing methods shows that the suggested approach can assist medical experts in automated detection of DFI.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootOsteomyelitisAmputation, SurgicalFootHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35432819
PMCPMC9007637
OpenAlexW4225939368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.