ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2022
New common bile duct morphological subtypes: Risk predictors of common bile duct stone recurrence.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Age-Associated Differences in Ductal Involvement in Biliary Lithiasis: A Consecutive MRCP Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Radiomics analysis based on MRCP for predicting post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with common bile duct stones.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- A comparative study of one-step vs. two-step approach in the treatment of pediatric gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Peroral cholangioscopy for detecting residual stones missed by cholangiography: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Effect of the extrahepatic bile duct anatomy on choledocholithiasis and its clinical significance.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Recurrence of common bile duct stones after endoscopic clearance and its predictors: A systematic review.DEN open · 2024Review
- Comprehensive review on small common bile duct stones.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Risk prediction of common bile duct stone recurrence based on new common bile duct morphological subtypes.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022Article
- Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with sphincterotomy for difficult common bile duct stones ≤12 mm: a prospective study.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the primary treatment for removing common bile duct (CBD) stones. The risk factors for CBD stone recurrence after ERCP have been discussed for many years. However, the influence of CBD morphology has never been noticed.
aimTo evaluate CBD morphology and other predictors affecting CBD stone recurrence in average patients.
methodsA retrospective analysis of 502 CBD stone patients who underwent successful therapeutic ERCP for stone extraction at our centre from February 2020 to January 2021 was conducted. CBD morphology and other predictors affecting CBD stone recurrence were examined by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
resultsCBD morphology (
conclusionCBD diameter ≥ 1.5 cm and CBD morphology, especially S type and polyline type, were associated with increased recurrence of CBD stones. In addition, ESBD was related to decreased recurrence. Patients with these risk factors should undergo periodic surveillance and standard prophylactic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.