ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
A Novel Psychotherapy Effect Detector of Public Art Based on ResNet and EEG Imaging.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methods: The EEG emotion dataset seed is used for feature extraction with DE, and the emotion is recognized by ResNet. Adam optimizer is used to classify the extracted DE through ResNet50 model. Each batch is set as 5 groups of data and is trained for 50 rounds, then the model is optimized, and the accuracy rate is 76.47%, which output the probability of good emotion through the model. We put the model optimized by ResNet into the intelligent module and visualize it with numerical value. Results: The detector designed by EEG data and ResNet50 optimization model has high accuracy. The results show that the error between the detector data and the questionnaire interview data is small, the average error is 2.77, and the accuracy is 97%. The closer the subject's emotion before the test is to neutral emotion, the closer the questionnaire result is to the test result of the tester, and the smaller the error is. The difference between the tester data and the survey questionnaire data is 0.2, which is in good agreement and has small error. It can be seen that the detector has high accuracy. Conclusion: Our proposed public art psychotherapy effect detector has good accuracy in detecting users' emotions. It can detect the group psychotherapy effect of public art and can classify and screen a large number of public arts in the city by quantitative methods. It provides support for further summarizing the practical utility of public art and provides a new way for the optimal design and follow-up evaluation of public art design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.