Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35432575›Full record

ArticleBioSocieties2022

Value-creation in the health data domain: a typology of what health data help us do.

Amelia Fiske, Alexander Degelsegger-Márquez, Brigitte Marsteurer, Barbara Prainsack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioSocieties, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ethical considerations on the use of big data and artificial intelligence in kidney research from the ERA ethics committee.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Wearable Technologies and Stress: Toward an Ethically Grounded Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amelia FiskeInstitute of History and Ethics in Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7207-6897
Alexander Degelsegger-MárquezAustrian National Public Health Institute (GÖG), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0493-4711
Brigitte MarsteurerAustrian National Public Health Institute (GÖG), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2005-0203
Barbara PrainsackDepartment of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6335-1532

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has become a trope to speak of the increasing value of health data in our societies. Such rhetoric is highly performative: it creates expectations, channels and justifies investments in data technologies and infrastructures, and portrays deliberations on political and legal issues as obstacles to the flow of data. Yet, important epistemic and political questions remain unexamined, such as how the value of data is created, what data journeys are envisioned by policies and regulation, and for whom data types are (intended to be) valuable. Drawing on two empirical cases, (a) interviews with physicians on the topic of digital selfcare, and (b) expectations of stakeholders on the use of Real-World Data in clinical trials, as well as existing literature, we propose a typology of what health data help us to do. This typology is intended to foster reflection about the different roles and values that data use unfolds. We conclude by discussing how regulation can better accommodate practices of valuation in the health data domain, with a particular focus on identifying regulatory challenges and opportunities for EU-level policy makers, and how Covid-19 has shed light on new aspects of each case.

Indexed as

Covid-19Data typeHealth dataRegulationValue

Identifiers

PMID35432575
PMCPMC9002030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.