Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35432505›Full record

SynthesisComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Application of PRP in Chloasma: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Tinghan Deng, Fengrui Cheng, Shanshan Guo, Hongbin Cheng, Jingping Wu

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Latin American consensus on the treatment of melasma.International journal of dermatology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tinghan DengClinical Research on Skin Diseases School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of TCM, Chengdu 610072, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2331-5780
Fengrui ChengDepartment of Medical Cosmetology, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3099-083X
Shanshan GuoClinical Research on Skin Diseases School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of TCM, Chengdu 610072, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2141-6139
Hongbin ChengDermatology of Department, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6711-713X
Jingping WuDepartment of Medical Cosmetology, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8447-7188
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNChengdu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chloasma is a common skin pigment disorder. Treatment of chloasma has been challenging, often unsatisfactory, and difficult to avoid recurrence. PRP is a new treatment for chloasma, but there is no consensus on its use. Lingyun Zhao's team recently reported a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of PRP in the treatment of chloasma, which is consistent with our ideas, but we will elaborate on the application of PRP in chloasma from a deeper and more comprehensive perspective. Before we started this study, we had registered with Prospero as CRD42021233721. Methods: The authors searched the public medical network, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Science Network. The clinical trials registry ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant publications to June 2021. The results showed the area and severity of chloasma (MASI) or revised MASI (mMASI) score. Results: Three RCTs, one nonrandomized controlled study, and four were prospective before and after self-controlled studies met the inclusive criteria. Intradermal PRP injections significantly improved chloasma as indicated by the significant decrease MASI (average balance -6.71, 95% CI -8.99 to -4.33) and mMASI scores (average balance -2.94, 95% CI -4.81 to -1.07). The adverse reactions were mild, and there were no significant long-term adverse events.

Indexed as

MelanosisPlatelet-Rich PlasmaHumansProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35432505
PMCPMC9010148
OpenAlexW4226353572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.