Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35432495›Full record

ArticleThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases2022

Pinching or stinging? Comparing prey capture among scorpions with contrasting morphologies.

Luis Fernando García, Juan Carlos Valenzuela-Rojas, Julio César González-Gómez, Mariángeles Lacava, Arie van der Meijden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterization ofToxins · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luis Fernando GarcíaEastern Regional University Center (CURE), University of the Republic, Treinta y Tres, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0001-8882-6226
Juan Carlos Valenzuela-RojasSemillero de Investigación INVUSCO, Grupo GIPB, Licenciatura en Ciencias Naturales y Educación Ambiental, Universidad Surcolombiana, Neiva, Huila, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-7425-0753
Julio César González-GómezBiology and Ecology of Arthropods (BEA) Research Group, Corporación Huiltur, Neiva, Huila, Colombia and Merenberg Foundation, La Plata, Huila, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-7672-6858
Mariángeles LacavaRivera University Center (CENUR Noreste), University of the Republic (Udelar), Rivera, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0003-4360-5694
Arie van der MeijdenBiology and Ecology of Arthropods (BEA) Research Group, Corporación Huiltur, Neiva, Huila, Colombia and Merenberg Foundation, La Plata, Huila, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-1317-5382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Scorpions can use their pincers and/or stingers to subdue and immobilize their prey. A scorpion can thus choose between strategies involving force or venom, or both, depending on what is required to subdue its prey. Scorpions vary greatly in the size and strength of their pincers, and in the efficacy of their venom. Whether this variability is driven by their defensive or prey incapacitation functionis unknown. In this study, we test if scorpion species with different pincer morphologies and venom efficacies use these weapons differently during prey subjugation. To that end, we observed Methods: The scorpion pinch force was measured, and behavioral experiments were performed with hard and soft prey ( Results: We found that scorpions with large pincers such as Conclusions: Our results show that scorpionspecies with massive pincers and high pinch force as

Indexed as

Bite forcePredatory behaviorScorpionsVenom use

Identifiers

PMID35432495
PMCPMC8985449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.