Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35432391›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Plant Breeding for Intercropping in Temperate Field Crop Systems: A Review.

Virginia M Moore, Brandon Schlautman, Shui-Zhang Fei, Lucas M Roberts, Marnin Wolfe, Matthew R Ryan, Samantha Wells, Aaron J Lorenz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Toward plant breeding for multicrop systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Virginia M MoorePlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Brandon SchlautmanThe Land Institute, Salina, KS, United States.
Shui-Zhang FeiDepartment of Horticulture, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Lucas M RobertsDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Marnin WolfePlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Matthew R RyanSoil and Crop Sciences Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Samantha WellsDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Aaron J LorenzDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoculture cropping systems currently dominate temperate agroecosystems. However, intercropping can provide valuable benefits, including greater yield stability, increased total productivity, and resilience in the face of pest and disease outbreaks. Plant breeding efforts in temperate field crops are largely focused on monoculture production, but as intercropping becomes more widespread, there is a need for cultivars adapted to these cropping systems. Cultivar development for intercropping systems requires a systems approach, from the decision to breed for intercropping systems through the final stages of variety testing and release. Design of a breeding scheme should include information about species variation for performance in intercropping, presence of genotype × management interaction, observation of key traits conferring success in intercropping systems, and the specificity of intercropping performance. Together this information can help to identify an optimal selection scheme. Agronomic and ecological knowledge are critical in the design of selection schemes in cropping systems with greater complexity, and interaction with other researchers and key stakeholders inform breeding decisions throughout the process. This review explores the above considerations through three case studies: (1) forage mixtures, (2) perennial groundcover systems (PGC), and (3) soybean-pennycress intercropping. We provide an overview of each cropping system, identify relevant considerations for plant breeding efforts, describe previous breeding focused on the cropping system, examine the extent to which proposed theoretical approaches have been implemented in breeding programs, and identify areas for future development.

Indexed as

agroecologyecosystem servicesintercroppingplant breedingpolyculturesustainable cropping systems

Identifiers

PMID35432391
PMCPMC9009171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.