Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35432163›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Prism Adaptation Treatment of Spatial Neglect: Feasibility During Inpatient Rehabilitation and Identification of Patients Most Likely to Benefit.

Robert W Gillen, Erin Y Harmon, Brittany Weil, Benjamin Fusco-Gessick, Paul P Novak, A M Barrett

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04977219 (Prism Adaptation Training for Treatment of Spatial Neglect During Inpatient Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04977219 completednot on this map

Prism Adaptation Training for Treatment of Spatial Neglect During Inpatient Rehabilitation

TypeobservationalSponsorSunnyview Rehabilitation HospitalRan2016 to 2019Enrolled74ConditionsStrokeArmsPrism Adaptation Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Neurorehabilitation Clinical Pathways in Stroke: The Padova Model.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert W GillenDepartment of Neuropsychology, Sunnyview Rehabilitation Hospital, Schenectady, NY, United States.
Erin Y HarmonDepartment of Neuropsychology, Sunnyview Rehabilitation Hospital, Schenectady, NY, United States.
Brittany WeilNeurorehabilitation Institute, Sunnyview Rehabilitation Hospital, Schenectady, NY, United States.
Benjamin Fusco-GessickDepartment of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, United States.
Paul P NovakNeurorehabilitation Institute, Sunnyview Rehabilitation Hospital, Schenectady, NY, United States.
A M BarrettCenter for Visual and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation, Atlanta VA Health System, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Emory University · USFordham University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Spatial Neglect is prevalent among stroke survivors, yet few treatments have evidence supporting efficacy. This study examines the feasibility of Prism Adaptation Treatment (PAT) within an inpatient rehabilitation facility and the degree by which PAT improves symptoms of spatial neglect and functional independence among sub-acute survivors of right hemispheric stroke. Design: In this retrospective cohort study, 37 right hemispheric stroke patients were identified as having received at least 4 PAT sessions during their inpatient stay. Spatial neglect and functional independence levels of patients in the PAT cohort were compared to a matched active control group comprised of rehabilitation patients receiving alternative therapies to address neglect admitted during the same time period. Results: Most patients received the full recommended 10 sessions of PAT (average sessions completed = 8.6). A higher percentage of severe neglect patients receiving PAT (69%) displayed clinically significant gains on FIM (≥22 points) compared to those receiving alternative treatments (6%). Patients with mild or moderate neglect in the PAT cohort did not exhibit greater benefit than controls. Conclusion: Provision of PAT for treatment of spatial neglect in right hemispheric stroke patients was feasible during the inpatient rehabilitation admission. Patients with severe neglect showed the most benefit from PAT. Clinical Trial Registration: This study was registered as a retrospective observational study on Itab Clinical Trials.gov. NCT04977219.

Indexed as

Catherine Bergego scaleprism adaptationrehabilitationspatial neglectstroke

Identifiers

PMID35432163
PMCPMC9010528
OpenAlexW4220658721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.