Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35432156›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2022

Efficacy of Disease Modifying Therapies in Progressive MS and How Immune Senescence May Explain Their Failure.

Navid Manouchehri, Victor H Salinas, Negar Rabi Yeganeh, David Pitt, Rehana Z Hussain, Olaf Stuve

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Safety and efficacy of cladribine in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Treatment of older patients with multiple sclerosis: Results of an International Delphi Survey.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Navid ManouchehriDepartment of Neurology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Victor H SalinasDepartment of Neurology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Negar Rabi YeganehDepartment of Radiopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
David PittDepartment of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Rehana Z HussainDepartment of Neurology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Olaf StuveDepartment of Neurology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of disease modifying therapies (DMT) in the past two decades has been the cornerstone of successful clinical management of multiple sclerosis (MS). Despite the great strides made in reducing the relapse frequency and occurrence of new signal changes on neuroimaging in patients with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) by approved DMT, it has been challenging to demonstrate their effectiveness in non-active secondary progressive MS (SPMS) and primary progressive MS (PPMS) disease phenotypes. The dichotomy of DMT effectiveness between RRMS and progressive MS informs on distinct pathogeneses of the different MS phenotypes. Conversely, factors that render patients with progressive MS resistant to therapy are not understood. Thus far, age has emerged as the main correlate of the transition from RRMS to SPMS. Whether it is aging and age-related factors or the underlying immune senescence that qualitatively alter immune responses as the disease transitions to SPMS, that diminish DMT effectiveness, or both, is currently not known. Here, we will discuss the role of immune senescence on different arms of the immune system, and how it may explain relative DMT resistance.

Indexed as

adaptive immunitydisease modifying therapiesimmunosenescenceinnate immunitymultiple sclerosisprogressive multiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID35432156
PMCPMC9009145
OpenAlexW4220821057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.