Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35432102›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

An Assist for Cognitive Diagnostics in Soccer: Two Valid Tasks Measuring Inhibition and Cognitive Flexibility in a Soccer-Specific Setting With a Soccer-Specific Motor Response.

Lisa Musculus, Franziska Lautenbach, Simon Knöbel, Martin Leo Reinhard, Peter Weigel, Nils Gatzmaga, Andy Borchert, Maximilian Pelka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa MusculusDepartment of Performance Psychology, Institute of Psychology, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Franziska LautenbachSport Psychology, Institute of Sport Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Simon KnöbelSport Psychology, Institute of Sport Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Martin Leo ReinhardDepartment of Performance Psychology, Institute of Psychology, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Peter WeigelUmbrella Sofware GmbH, Leipzig, Germany.
Nils GatzmagaRasenBallsport Leipzig GmbH, Leipzig, Germany.
Andy BorchertRasenBallsport Leipzig GmbH, Leipzig, Germany.
Maximilian PelkaRasenBallsport Leipzig GmbH, Leipzig, Germany.
German Sport University Cologne · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEInstitut für Angewandte Trainingswissenschaft · DEUniversität Bayern · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In professional soccer, players, coaches, and researchers alike recognize the importance of cognitive skills. Research addressing the relevance of cognitive skills has been based on the cognitive component skills approach (i.e., general cognitive processes) or the expert performance approach (i.e., sport-specific cognitive processes). Our project aimed to combine the strengths of both approaches to develop and validate cognitive tasks measuring inhibition and cognitive flexibility in a soccer-specific setting with a soccer-specific motor response. In the main study 77 elite youth soccer players completed a computerized version of the standard flanker and number-letter tasks as well as flanker and number-letter tasks requiring a soccer-specific motor response (i.e., pass) in a soccer-specific setting (i.e., the SoccerBot360). Results show good reliability for both tasks. For the SoccerBot360 number-letter task, switch effects for response times and accuracy and acceptable convergent validity were shown. A flanker effect for response time but not accuracy was apparent. Due to no acceptable convergent validity, the flanker task was revised (i.e., adaptation of stimuli) and 63 adult soccer players participated in a follow-up validation study in the SoccerBot100. The revised flanker task showed the flanker effect for response time, but not for accuracy. However, acceptable convergent validity for response time was present. Thus, the soccer-specific number-letter and to some extent the soccer-specific flanker task show potential to be used as a valid cognitive diagnostic tool by soccer clubs.

Indexed as

diagnosticselite youth soccerexecutive functionstalent developmenttalent identification

Identifiers

PMID35432102
PMCPMC9009540
OpenAlexW4221073835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.