ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022
Physical Time Within Human Time.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motivation and Time: Motivational Congruence Theory's Stance.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2025Article
- Time Dilation in Motivational Congruence Theory's Paradigm.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2025Article
- Measuring the perception and metacognition of time.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Editorial: Physical time within human time.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Commentary: "Physical time within human time" and "Bridging the neuroscience and physics of time".Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Commentary: Physical time within human time.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Disjoint components of manifest time: Commentary: Physical time within human time.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Commentary: Physical time within human time.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Commentary: Physical time within human time.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Commentary: Physical time within human time.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Commentary: Physical time within human time.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- The Three-Times Problem: Commentary on Physical Time within Human Time.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Commentary: "Physical time within human time" and "Bridging the neuroscience and physics of time".Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Commentary: Physical time within human time.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Commentary: Physical time within human time.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Commentary: Physical time within human time.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Commentary: Physical time within human time.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Commentary: Extracting robust passage from dynamic change.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Commentary: "Physical time within human time" and "Bridging the neuroscience and physics of time".Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- From illusion to reality and back in time perception.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A possible solution is offered to help resolve the "two times problem" regarding the veridical and illusory nature of time. First it is recognized that the flow (passage) of time is part of a wider array of temporal experiences referred to as manifest time, all of which need to be reconciled. Then, an information gathering and utilizing system (IGUS) model is used as a basis for a view of manifest time. The model IGUS robot of Hartle that solves the "unique present" debate is enhanced with veridical and (corresponding) illusory components of not only the flow of time but also the larger entity of manifest time, providing a dualistic IGUS robot that represents all of the important temporal experiences. Based upon a variety of prior experiments, that view suggests that the veridical system is a reflection of accepted spacetime cosmologies and through natural selection begets the illusory system for functional purposes. Thus, there are not two opposing times, one outside and one inside the cranium. There is just one fundamental physical time which the brain developed, now possesses and is itself sufficient for adaption but then enhances. The illusory system is intended to provide a more satisfying experience of physical time, and better adaptive behavior. Future experiments to verify that view are provided. With a complete veridical system of temporal experiences there may be less need to reify certain temporal experiences so that the two times problem is less of a problem and more of a phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.