Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35431838›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2022

Therapy-Induced Electrophysiological Changes in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Preliminary Study.

Jara Stalpaert, Sofie Standaert, Lien D'Helft, Marijke Miatton, Anne Sieben, Tim Van Langenhove, Wouter Duyck, Pieter van Mierlo, Miet De Letter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 61% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jara StalpaertDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sofie StandaertLogopediepraktijk Bieke Van Waeyenberghe, Lievegem, Belgium.
Lien D'HelftLogopediepraktijk Bieke Van Waeyenberghe, Lievegem, Belgium.
Marijke MiattonDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Anne SiebenDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Tim Van LangenhoveDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Wouter DuyckDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Pieter van MierloMedical Image and Signal Processing Group, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Miet De LetterDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: This preliminary study aimed to investigate therapy-induced electrophysiological changes in persons with primary progressive aphasia (PPA). The investigated event-related potential (ERP) components associated with language processing were the mismatch negativity, P300, N400, and P600. Methods: A linguistic ERP test battery and standardized language assessment were administered in four patients with PPA of which two received speech-language therapy (SLT) and two did not receive therapy. The battery was administered twice with approximately 6 months in between in each patient. The results of the follow-up assessments were compared to the results of the initial assessments. Results: Although the results of the behavioral language assessment remained relatively stable between the initial and follow-up assessments, changes in the mean amplitudes, onset latencies, and duration of the ERP components were found in the four patients. In the two patients that did not receive SLT, an increased delay in 50% and a decreased mean amplitude in 25% of the measured ERP components were found. The electrophysiological changes found in the patients that received SLT were variable. Interestingly, the mismatch negativity and the N400 effect elicited by the categorical priming paradigm were less delayed and had an increased mean amplitude at the follow-up assessment in the patient with the non-fluent variant who received SLT. In this patient, the P600 component was absent at the initial assessment but present at the follow-up assessment. Conclusion: Although no clear patterns in electrophysiological changes between patients who received SLT and patients who did not receive SLT were found by our preliminary study, it seems like the SLT induced improvements or compensation mechanisms in some specific language comprehension processes in the patient with the NFV. The results of this study are still preliminary because only four heterogeneous patients were included. Future studies should include larger patient groups of the three clinical variants because the therapy-induced electrophysiological changes might differ depending on the clinical variant and the underlying pathology.

Indexed as

event-related potentialsfollow-uplanguagelanguage therapyneuroplasticityprimary progressive aphasia

Identifiers

PMID35431838
PMCPMC9008202
OpenAlexW4220749849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.