Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35431836›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2022

Can an Online Reading Camp Teach 5-Year-Old Children to Read?

Yael Weiss, Jason D Yeatman, Suzanne Ender, Liesbeth Gijbels, Hailley Loop, Julia C Mizrahi, Bo Y Woo, Patricia K Kuhl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yael WeissInstitute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jason D YeatmanGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Suzanne EnderInstitute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Liesbeth GijbelsInstitute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Hailley LoopInstitute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Julia C MizrahiInstitute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Bo Y WooInstitute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Patricia K KuhlInstitute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

Mechanisms of Brain Dysmorphology in MN1 C-Terminal Truncation Syndrome, a Novel Intellectual Developmental Disability Disorder P50HD103524 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Sandra E Juul · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
Biological origins of literacyR21HD092771 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KUHL, PATRICIA K, YEATMAN, JASON D · 2018 to 2019
$435k
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103524NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD092771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literacy is an essential skill. Learning to read is a requirement for becoming a self-providing human being. However, while spoken language is acquired naturally with exposure to language without explicit instruction, reading and writing need to be taught explicitly. Decades of research have shown that well-structured teaching of phonological awareness, letter knowledge, and letter-to-sound mapping is crucial in building solid foundations for the acquisition of reading. During the COVID-19 pandemic, children worldwide did not have access to consistent and structured teaching and are, as a consequence, predicted to be behind in the development of their reading skills. Subsequent evidence confirms this prediction. With the best evidence-based practice in mind, we developed an online version of a well-structured early literacy training program (Reading Camp) for 5-year-old children. This 2-week online Reading Camp program is designed for pre-K children. It incorporates critical components of the fundamental skills essential to learning to read and is taught online in an interactive, multi-sensory, and peer-learning environment. We measure the participants' literacy skills and other related skills before and after participating in the online Reading Camp and compare the results to no-treatment controls. Results show that children who participated in the online Reading Camp improved significantly on all parameters in relation to controls. Our results demonstrate that a well-structured evidence-based reading instruction program, even if online and short-term, benefits 5-year-old children in learning to read. With the potential to scale up this online program, the evidence presented here, alongside previous evidence for the efficacy of the in-person program, indicates that the online Reading Camp program is effective and can be used to tackle a variety of questions regarding structural and functional plasticity in the early stages of reading acquisition.

Indexed as

letter-sound knowledgeonline learningphonological awarenesspreschoolreading acquisition

Identifiers

PMID35431836
PMCPMC9009259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.