Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35431821›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2022

Emergence of Extreme Paw Accelerations During Cat Paw Shaking: Interactions of Spinal Central Pattern Generator, Hindlimb Mechanics and Muscle Length-Depended Feedback.

Boris I Prilutsky, Jessica Parker, Gennady S Cymbalyuk, Alexander N Klishko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Closed-loop regulation system for paralyzed lower limb joint movement based on electrical stimulation of spinal central pattern generator].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Boris I PrilutskyLaboratory of Biomechanics and Motor Control, School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jessica ParkerDynamical Neuroscience Laboratory, Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Gennady S CymbalyukDynamical Neuroscience Laboratory, Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Alexander N KlishkoLaboratory of Biomechanics and Motor Control, School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Funding

Limb coordination during locomotion before and after spinal cord injuryR01NS110550 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BORIS I PRILUTSKY, Ilya A Rybak · 2020 to 2026
$3.9M
Neural mechanisms of locomotion evoked by epidural stimulation of the spinal cordR01NS100928 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PRILUTSKY, BORIS I · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
Role of Na+/K+ pump in rhythm generation of a motor control circuitR21NS111355 · NINDS · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALABRESE, RONALD L, CYMBALYUK, GENNADY S · 2019 to 2019
$439k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS100928NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110550NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS111355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cat paw shaking is a spinal reflex for removing an irritating stimulus from paw by developing extremely high paw accelerations. Previous studies of paw shaking revealed a proximal-to-distal gradient of hindlimb segmental velocities/accelerations, as well as complex inter-joint coordination: passive motion-dependent interaction moments acting on distal segments are opposed by distal muscle moments. However, mechanisms of developing extreme paw accelerations during paw shaking remain unknown. We hypothesized that paw-shaking mechanics and muscle activity might correspond to a whip-like mechanism of energy generation and transfer along the hindlimb. We first demonstrated in experiments with five intact, adult, female cats that during paw shaking, energy generated by proximal muscle moments was transmitted to distal segments by joint forces. This energy transfer was mostly responsible for the segmental velocity/acceleration proximal-to-distal gradient. Distal muscle moments mostly absorbed energy of the distal segments. We then developed a neuromechanical model of hindlimb paw shaking comprised a half-center CPG, activating hip flexors and extensors, and passive viscoelastic distal muscles that produced length/velocity-depended force. Simulations reproduced whip-like mechanisms found experimentally: the proximal-to-distal velocity/acceleration gradient, energy transfer by joint forces and energy absorption by distal muscle moments, as well as atypical co-activation of ankle and hip flexors with knee extensors. Manipulating model parameters, including reversal of segmental inertia distal-to-proximal gradient, demonstrated important inertia contribution to developing the segmental velocity/acceleration proximal-to-distal gradient. We concluded that extreme paw accelerations during paw shaking result from interactions between a spinal CPG, hindlimb segmental inertia, and muscle length/velocity-depended feedback that tunes limb viscoelastic properties.

Indexed as

AnimatLabcat paw-shake responsecentral pattern generatorEMG activityinter-segmental energy transferneuromechanical modelingwhip-like motion

Identifiers

PMID35431821
PMCPMC9007247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.