Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35431805›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2022

Advances and Barriers in Understanding Presynaptic

Annemarie Dedek, Michael E Hildebrand

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Glaucine suppresses IL-16/CD4 to alleviate neuropathic pain via spinal p56Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Spinal antinociceptive effect of the PnTx4(5-5) peptide is possibly mediated by the NMDA autoreceptors.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A compendium of validated pain genes.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annemarie DedekDepartment of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Michael E HildebrandDepartment of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Carleton University · CAOttawa Hospital Research Institute

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades,

Indexed as

developmental timepointsdorsal hornNMDARpainpresynapticprimary afferentsex differencesspinal cord

Identifiers

PMID35431805
PMCPMC9008455
OpenAlexW4221041937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.