Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35431757›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia

Non-intubated general anesthesia in prone position for advanced biliopancreatic therapeutic endoscopy: A single tertiary referral center experience.

Valentina Melis, Cristalli Aldo, Lorenzo Dioscoridi, Sergio Arlati, Pietro Molinari, Marcello Cintolo, Francesco Pugliese, Giulia Bonato, Edoardo Forti, Mutignani Massimiliano

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valentina MelisDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit, ASST Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Cristalli AldoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit, ASST Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo DioscoridiDepartment of Surgery, Digestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, ASST Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Sergio ArlatiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit, ASST Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Pietro MolinariDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit, ASST Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Marcello CintoloDepartment of Surgery, Digestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, ASST Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Francesco PuglieseDepartment of Surgery, Digestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, ASST Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Giulia BonatoDepartment of Surgery, Digestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, ASST Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Edoardo FortiDepartment of Surgery, Digestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, ASST Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Mutignani MassimilianoDepartment of Surgery, Digestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, ASST Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Study Aim: Advance biliopancreatic endoscopies are nowadays performed in non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) under general anesthesia (GA). We evaluate the outcomes of non-intubated patients in prone position who received GA for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in a tertiary referral center for digestive endoscopy. Patients and Methods: Anesthesiological records, anamnestic, and intraoperative data of patients who underwent advanced therapeutic biliopancreatic endoscopies at our tertiary referral center from January 2019 until January 2020 were collected in the present observational study. Results: One hundred fifty-three patients (93 M; median age: 68-year-old; mean ASA status: 2) were considered eligible for a procedure in the prone position with GA in spontaneous breathing. Prone position was always the initial setting. Propofol administration through a target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump was the choice to achieve GA. In our experience, desaturation appears to be the most frequent adverse event, accounting for 35% of cases (55/153). Treatment foresaw additional oxygen through a nasopharyngeal catheter, which proved to be a sufficient measure in almost all patients (52/55). Other adverse events (i.e., inadequate sedative plan, pain, and bradycardia) accounted for 2.6% of cases (4/153). Conclusions: Non-intubated GA in the prone position may be regarded as a safe procedure, as long as the anesthesiological criteria of exclusion are respected and the anesthesiological team has become acquainted with the peculiar NORA setting and familiar with the management of possible adverse events.

Indexed as

Deep sedationERCPgeneral anesthesiaprone positiontherapeutic endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID35431757
PMCPMC9009548
OpenAlexW4224300266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.