Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35431683›Full record

ArticleFinance research letters2022

Response of stock market volatility to COVID-19 announcements and stringency measures: A comparison of developed and emerging markets.

Walid Bakry, Peter John Kavalmthara, Vivienne Saverimuttu, Yiyang Liu, Sajan Cyril

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Finance research letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. COVID-19 vaccines and global stock markets.Finance research letters · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Walid BakrySchool of Business, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Peter John KavalmtharaUNSW Business School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Vivienne SaverimuttuSchool of Business, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Yiyang LiuSchool of Business, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Sajan CyrilAustralian Institute of Higher Education, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between the daily release of COVID-19 related announcements, defensive government interventions, and stock market volatility, drawing upon an extended time period of one year, to independently test, confirm and iteratively improve on previous research findings. We categorize stock markets into emerging and developed markets and consider differences and similarities utilizing an asymmetric measure of volatility. We find that there are major differences between these markets with respect to investors' interpretation of risk in response to daily new confirmed cases, death rates, recovery rates, and different defensive government interventions. We suggest explanations for these differences, in terms of national culture, and the quality of governance. Moreover, the development of Pfizer-BioNTech's vaccine is of immense importance to both markets. The findings have implications for tailoring government responses to crises in country-specific contexts.

Indexed as

COVID-19 announcementsDeveloped marketsEmerging marketsGJR-GARCHStock market volatility

Identifiers

PMID35431683
PMCPMC8994447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.