ArticleOpen access journal of contraception2022
Determinants of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Discontinuation Among Women Using Family Planning, in Southwest Ethiopia: Unmatched Case-Control Study.
Article in Open access journal of contraception, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Magnitude and Factors for Early Discontinuation of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Use Among Clients at Marie Stopes Maternal and Child Health Center, Adama, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Discontinuation Rate of Intrauterine Device and Associated Factors Among Women in the Last One Year in Angacha District, Southern Ethiopia.Open access journal of contraception · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although the intrauterine contraceptive device is an effective, reliable, safe, and recommended contraceptive method, it is still underutilized and has a high discontinuation rate in Ethiopia. The study aims to assess determinants of the discontinuation of IUCDs among women using family planning in Ilu Aba Bor Zone. Methods: A facility-based unmatched case-control study was conducted from September to October, 2021 among 168 (56 cases and 112 controls) IUCD-user women in public health facilities in south-west Ethiopia. Pretested, structured and interviewer administered questionnaires were used for data collection. The data were coded, cleaned and entered to Epi-data version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 23 for advanced analysis. A binary logistic regression was used to estimate the degree of association between the outcome variable and independent variables. Finally, variables with a p-value less than 0.05 at 95% confidence interval were declared as statistically significant with outcome variable. Results: A total of 168 (163) respondents participated in the study, with a response rate of 97%. The mean (+SD) age of the respondents was 31.36 ± 5.916. Regarding the educational status of respondents about 36 (64.3%) of cases and 90 (84.1%) of controls have formal education, and about 42 (75%) of cases' husbands and 97 (90.65%) of controls' husbands have formal education, respectively. Experiencing side effects (AOR = 2.36; 95% CI: 1.01, 5.55), lack of follow up (AOR = 4.069; 95% CI: l.30, 12.69), and planning for next pregnancy (AOR 4.14; 95% CI: 1.58, 10.88) were found to be the main determinants of intrauterine device discontinuation. Conclusion: The findings of the study showed that lack of follow-up after insertion of the IUCD, experiencing side effects, and having a plan for the next pregnancy were found to be the main determinants of intrauterine device discontinuation. Hence, arranging recommended regular follow-up and treating side effects are very important to sustain intrauterine device utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.