Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35431578›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2022

Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine in the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

José Eduardo Guimarães Pereira, Lucas Ferreira Gomes Pereira, Rafael Mercante Linhares, Carlos Darcy Alves Bersot, Theodoros Aslanidis, Hazem Adel Ashmawi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

José Eduardo Guimarães PereiraLaboratório de Investigação Médica (LIM/08), Department of Anesthesiology, University of São Paulo Medical School - FMUSP, São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2320-4607
Lucas Ferreira Gomes PereiraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Centro Médico de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-190, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7802-8877
Rafael Mercante LinharesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital Municipal Miguel Couto, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 22430-160, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5855-6958
Carlos Darcy Alves BersotDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital Federal da Lagoa, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 22470-050, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0464-7990
Theodoros AslanidisIntensive Care Unit, Saint Paul General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Central Macedonia, 54633, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8325-8861
Hazem Adel AshmawiLaboratório de Investigação Médica (LIM/08), Department of Anesthesiology, University of São Paulo Medical School - FMUSP, São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0957-971X
Universidade de São Paulo · BRCentro de Tecnologia da Informação Renato Archer · BRHospital Geral de Bonsucesso · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Ketamine is a N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist with strong analgesic properties. Its addition to the treatment of neuropathic pain may reduce pain intensity and improve overall quality of life. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to investigate the addition of ketamine to the treatment of patients with neuropathic pain. Patients and Methods: GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach was used to rate the overall certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Eighteen (18) randomized controlled trials including 706 participants were included for further analysis. Results: Ketamine addition to standard treatment of neuropathic pain (NP) resulted in a statistically significant reduction of pain intensity at one week after the end of treatment with ketamine (MD -2.14, 95% CI -2.65 to -1.63; p<0.00001) and after 30 days after the end of treatment with ketamine (MD -1.68, 95% CI -2.25 to -1.12; p<0.00001) and a statistically significant increase in discomfort (RR 4.06; 95% CI 1.18 to 13.95; p=0.03), and psychedelic effects (RR 4.94; 95% CI 2.76 to 8.84; p<0.00001). Conclusion: There is a statistically significant pain reduction by adding ketamine to the treatment of chronic NP when compared to the standard treatment. However, such pain reduction comes at the expense of adverse outcomes, especially psychedelic effects related to the administration of ketamine. However, the overall quality of certainty of evidence is low due to the clinical heterogeneity among the intervention characteristics of the trials analyzed (different administration routes, dosing regimen, therapy durations, different clinical characteristics of the population investigated). Future large multi-centered trials are necessary to confirm or not the results of the present review.

Indexed as

chronic painketamineneuralgianeuropathytreatment

Identifiers

PMID35431578
PMCPMC9007468
OpenAlexW4226270886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.