Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35431549›Full record

ArticleVascular health and risk management2022

Early Identification of Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia with Endoscopic Duplex Ultrasound.

Nathkai Safi, Kim Vidar Ånonsen, Simen Tveten Berge, Asle Wilhelm Medhus, Jon Otto Sundhagen, Jonny Hisdal, Syed Sajid Hussain Kazmi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vascular health and risk management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nathkai SafiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9625-6785
Kim Vidar ÅnonsenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1462-540X
Simen Tveten BergeDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
Asle Wilhelm MedhusDepartment of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7118-5127
Jon Otto SundhagenDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3972-8475
Jonny HisdalDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
Syed Sajid Hussain KazmiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7850-2033
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Due to diagnostic delay, chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is underdiagnosed. We assumed that the patients suspected of CMI of the atherosclerotic origin or median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) could be identified earlier with endoscopic duplex ultrasound (E-DUS). Patients and Methods: Fifty CMI patients with CTA-verified stenosis of either ≥50% and ≥70% of celiac artery (CA) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) were examined with E-DUS and transabdominal duplex ultrasound (TA-DUS). Peak systolic velocities (PSV) of ≥200cm/s and ≥275cm/s for CA and SMA, respectively, were compared with CTA. Subgroup analysis was performed for the patients with (n=21) and without (n=29) prior revascularization treatment of CMI. The diagnostic ability of E-DUS and TA-DUS was tested with crosstabulation analysis. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to investigate the test accuracy. Results: In the patients with ≥70% stenosis, E-DUS had higher sensitivity than TA-DUS (91% vs 81% for CA and 100% vs 92% for SMA). AUC for SMA ≥70% in E-DUS was 0.75 and with TA-DUS 0.68. The sensitivity of E-DUS for CTA-verified stenosis ≥70% for CA was 100% in the patients without prior treatment. E-DUS demonstrated higher sensitivity than TA-DUS for both arteries with stenosis ≥50% and ≥70% in the treatment-naive patients. Conclusion: E-DUS is equally valid as TA-DUS for the investigation of CMI patients and should be used as an initial diagnostic tool for patients suspected of CMI.

Indexed as

Mesenteric IschemiaBlood Flow VelocityConstriction, PathologicDelayed DiagnosisHumansIschemiaRetrospective Studiesacute mesenteric ischemiachronic mesenteric ischemiacomputed tomography angiographyduplex ultrasoundintestinal ischemiaMALS

Identifiers

PMID35431549
PMCPMC9005355
OpenAlexW4226154052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.