Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35431434›Full record

ArticleJournal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy : RET2023

Improving Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Autistic Individuals: A Delphi Survey with Practitioners.

Debbie Spain, Victoria Milner, David Mason, Hannah Iannelli, Chris Attoe, Ruwani Ampegama, Lorcan Kenny, Aleks Saunders, Francesca Happé, Karina Marshall-Tate

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy : RET, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Debbie SpainSocial, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, de Crespigny Park, PO Box 80, London, SE5 8AF England, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7680-0237
Victoria MilnerSocial, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, de Crespigny Park, PO Box 80, London, SE5 8AF England, UK.
David MasonSocial, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, de Crespigny Park, PO Box 80, London, SE5 8AF England, UK.
Hannah IannelliSouth London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK.
Chris AttoeSouth London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK.
Ruwani AmpegamaSouth London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK.
Lorcan KennyAutistica, London, England, UK.
Aleks SaundersSouth London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK.
Francesca HappéSocial, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, de Crespigny Park, PO Box 80, London, SE5 8AF England, UK.
Karina Marshall-TateSouth London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK.
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBAutistica · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is emerging evidence of the effectiveness of individual and group cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for autistic individuals, in particular to address anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder and depression. Many CBT studies have incorporated relatively stringent standards, with regards to participant inclusion/exclusion criteria, delivery of manualised approaches and assurance of therapist training and oversight. We know less about what happens in routine CBT practice and, importantly, how service provision can be improved for autistic individuals. The present study recruited 50 CBT practitioners to a three round Delphi survey. The aims were to elicit professionals' perspectives regarding barriers to the acceptability and effectiveness of CBT for autistic individuals, and to generate consensus, both about ways of enhancing service provision, as well as the autism-relevant training needs of CBT practitioners. Study findings indicated six barriers to accessible and effective CBT for autistic individuals, relating to service provision, practitioner-related factors, client-related factors, CBT-related factors, national guidelines, and systemic considerations. There was participant consensus that changes in five domains (specifically relating to process issues, service provision, practitioners, techniques and therapeutic approach) could improve the CBT care pathway. Consensus was generated about the training needs of CBT practitioners: training about autism, CBT-specific issues, co-occurring conditions and engagement, were deemed fundamental for enhancing practice. Participants also identified autism-relevant issues for clinical supervision. Further sustained research is needed to determine the effects of adapted service provision and improved practitioner knowledge and skills on the outcomes of autistic individuals who have CBT.

Indexed as

AutismClinical supervisionCognitive behaviour therapy (CBT)PractitionersTraining

Identifiers

PMID35431434
PMCPMC8991669
OpenAlexW4224221557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.