Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35431402›Full record

ArticleFood policy2022

Are home gardening programs a sustainable way to improve nutrition? Lessons from a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Rufiji, Tanzania.

Mia M Blakstad, Dominic Mosha, Lilia Bliznashka, Alexandra L Bellows, Chelsey R Canavan, Mashavu H Yussuf, Killian Mlalama, Isabel Madzorera, Jarvis T Chen, Ramadhani A Noor and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mia M BlakstadDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Dominic MoshaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Lilia BliznashkaDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Alexandra L BellowsDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Chelsey R CanavanDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Mashavu H YussufAfrica Academy for Public Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Killian MlalamaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Isabel MadzoreraDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Jarvis T ChenDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Ramadhani A NoorDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Joyce KinaboDepartment of Food Science Technology, Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Honorati MasanjaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Wafaie W FawziDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Harvard Global Health Institute · USIfakara Health Institute · TZHarvard University · USAfrica Academy for Public Health · TZSokoine University of Agriculture · TZ

Funding

Tanzania Infectious Disease Research Training ProgramD43TW007886 · FIC · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI FAWZI, WAFAIE W · 2007 to 2018
$1.9M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW007886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homestead food production (HFP) programs may improve diet and nutrition outcomes by increasing availability of nutrient dense foods such as vegetables and supporting livelihoods. We conducted a pair-matched cluster-randomized controlled trial to investigate whether vegetable home gardens could improve women's dietary diversity, household food security, maternal and child iron status, and the probability of women consuming nutrient-rich food groups. We enrolled 1,006 women of reproductive age (18-49 years) in ten villages in Pwani Region, Eastern Tanzania, matched the villages into pairs according to village characteristics, and randomly allocated villages to intervention or control. Households in the intervention villages received agricultural training, inputs to promote home production of nutritious crops, and nutrition and health education. Data were collected in 2016, 2017, and 2019 and analyzed using linear regression models with propensity score weighting adjusting for individual-level confounders, differential loss to follow-up, and fixed effects for village pairs to accommodate the pair-matched design. Results after one year of the intervention (previously published) found significant improvements in dietary diversity. However, three years after the start of the intervention the difference in dietary diversity disappeared, even though the number of women who grew at least one crop was significantly higher (75 percentage points, 95% CI: 72, 81) in treatment households compared to controls. Barriers to maintaining a home garden, including lack of irrigation opportunities and fencing materials, and social disruption may have precluded sustained impacts from home gardening in this context. Future home garden programs should carefully consider mechanisms and investments needed for sustained impact over time.

Indexed as

community health workersdietary diversityHomestead food productionimplementation sciencematernal nutritionnutrition-sensitive agriculture

Identifiers

PMID35431402
PMCPMC9012451
OpenAlexW4220876868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.