Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35431370›Full record

ArticleCognitive therapy and research2020

Predictors of Treatment Outcome in Group or Individual Cognitive Processing Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Active Duty Military.

Patricia A Resick, Stefanie T LoSavio, Jennifer Schuster Wachen, Kirsten H Dillon, Erica E Nason, Katherine A Dondanville, Stacey Young-McCaughan, Alan L Peterson, Jeffrey S Yarvis, Jim Mintz and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive therapy and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia A ResickDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, 1121 West Chapel Hill Street, Durham, NC 27707, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2203-2404
Stefanie T LoSavioDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, 1121 West Chapel Hill Street, Durham, NC 27707, USA.
Jennifer Schuster WachenWomen's Health Sciences Division, National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Kirsten H DillonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, 1121 West Chapel Hill Street, Durham, NC 27707, USA.
Erica E NasonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Katherine A DondanvilleDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Stacey Young-McCaughanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Alan L PetersonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Jeffrey S YarvisDepartment of Behavioral Health, Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center, Fort Hood, TX, USA.
Jim MintzDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
STRONG STAR Consortium
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USDuke University · USBoston University · USCarl R. Darnall Army Medical Center · USTexas State University · US

Funding

RRD VA IK2 RX002965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine demographic, psychological, military, and deployment variables that might predict posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom improvement in a sample of active duty service members who received either group or individual cognitive processing therapy (CPT). Methods: Data were analyzed from 165 active duty service members with pre- and posttreatment data participating in a randomized controlled trial comparing group with individual CPT. Pretreatment variables were examined as predictors of change in PTSD severity from baseline to posttreatment, assessed using the PTSD Symptom Scale-Interview Version (PSS-I). Predictors of PSS-I change were first evaluated using Pearson correlations, followed by partial and multiple correlations to clarify which associations remained when effects of other predictors were controlled. Multiple regression analyses were used to test for interactions between pretreatment variables and treatment format. Results: Only age was a significant predictor of PTSD symptom change after controlling for other variables and statisitically correcting for testing multiple variables. There was also an interaction between age and treatment format. Conclusions: Younger participants had greater symptom improvement, particularly if they received individual treatment. Other pretreatment variables did not predict outcome. CPT appears to be robust across most pretreatment variables, such that comorbid disorders, baseline symptom severity, and suicidal ideation do not interfere with application of CPT. However, individual CPT may be a better option particularly for younger service members.

Indexed as

Cognitive processing therapyPosttraumatic stress disorderPredictors of outcomeRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID35431370
PMCPMC9009298
OpenAlexW3007514735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.