Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35431299›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology2022

Persistence of Mental Health Deterioration Among People Living Alone During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Periodically-repeated Longitudinal Study.

Hiroyuki Kikuchi, Masaki Machida, Itaru Nakamura, Reiko Saito, Yuko Odagiri, Noritoshi Fukushima, Tomoko Takamiya, Shiho Amagasa, Keisuke Fukui, Takako Kojima and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Loneliness, affectivity and psychological distress in people living alone during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cluster analysis.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2026
    Article
  2. Partnership Quality and Mental Health Among Older Adults in England Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hiroyuki KikuchiDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University.ORCID 0000-0003-0510-1030
Masaki MachidaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University.ORCID 0000-0002-7060-7305
Itaru NakamuraDepartment of Infection Prevention and Control, Tokyo Medical University Hospital.
Reiko SaitoDivision of International Health (Public Health), Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University.
Yuko OdagiriDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University.
Noritoshi FukushimaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University.ORCID 0000-0003-1819-554X
Tomoko TakamiyaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University.ORCID 0000-0003-0821-9675
Shiho AmagasaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University.ORCID 0000-0002-6047-0771
Keisuke FukuiGraduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University.
Takako KojimaDepartment of International Medical Communications, Tokyo Medical University.ORCID 0000-0001-8300-2690
Hidehiro WatanabeDepartment of Infection Prevention and Control, Tokyo Medical University Hospital.
Shigeru InoueDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University.ORCID 0000-0003-1931-2613

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis longitudinal study aimed to investigate how psychological distress levels changed from early to middle phases of the new coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic depending on the living arrangements of individuals.

methodsAn internet-based, longitudinal survey of 2,400 Japanese people was conducted every 5-6 weeks between February 2020 and January 2021. The presence of severe psychological distress (SPD) was measured using the Kessler's psychological distress scale. Living arrangements were classified into two groups (ie, living alone or living with others). Mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was performed to assess whether changes in SPD status were different depending on living arrangements.

resultsOf 2,400 respondents, 446 (18.5%) lived alone. Although the proportion of SPD in both individuals living alone and those living with others increased to the same extent in the early phase of the pandemic, the distress levels decreased after the early phase of the pandemic in the group living with others, compared with the group living alone, for which SPD remained high. The odds ratio (OR) of developing SPD in interaction term with survey phases tended to be higher among those who lived alone than those who lived with others in Phase 6 (OR 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-3.64) and Phase 7 (OR 1.88; 95% CI, 0.97-3.63).

conclusionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, those living alone are persistently at a higher risk of SPD compared to those living with others. Effective countermeasures targeting those living alone, such as enhancing online communication or providing psychological therapies, are essential.

Indexed as

COVID-19Home EnvironmentHumansLongitudinal StudiesMental HealthPandemicsK6living arrangementnovel coronaviruspsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID35431299
PMCPMC9189317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.