Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35431253›Full record

SynthesisJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2022

Physical Activity and Cognition in Sedentary Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yan Zhao, Yan Li, Lijing Wang, Zihe Song, Tengsen Di, Xinyi Dong, Xiaohan Song, Xintong Han, Yanyan Zhao, Bingfei Wang and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Psychological Stress and Cognitive Brain Health: Policies to Reduce Dementia Risk.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Mind body exercise improves cognitive function more than aerobic- and resistance exercise in healthy adults aged 55 years and older - an umbrella review.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yan ZhaoSchool of Nursing, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Yan LiSchool of Nursing, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Lijing WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Eighth People's Hospital of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, China.
Zihe SongSchool of Nursing, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Tengsen DiSchool of Nursing, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xinyi DongSchool of Nursing, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xiaohan SongSchool of Nursing, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xintong HanSchool of Nursing, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Yanyan ZhaoSchool of Nursing, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Bingfei WangSchool of Nursing, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
HuiXian CuiDepartment of Anatomy, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Haiying ChenSchool of Nursing, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Sha LiDepartment of Anatomy, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Hebei Medical University · CNHospital of Hebei Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidemiologic evidence suggests that physical activity benefits cognition, but results from randomized trials in sedentary individuals are limited and inconsistent.

objectiveTo evaluate the effects of physical activity on cognition among sedentary older adults.

objectiveA systematic literature search for eligible studies published up to January 1, 2021, was performed on six international (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Sinomed, FMRS, and OVID) and three Chinese databases (Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and VIP). We estimated the effect of physical activity on the cognition of sedentary elderly by standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model. We evaluated publication bias using funnel plots and heterogeneity using I2 statistics. Subgroup analyses were conducted by baseline cognition, intervention duration, activity type, and country.

resultsSeven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 321 (experimental group, 164; control group, 157) sedentary older adults were included in the meta-analysis. Physical activity significantly improved cognition in sedentary elderly adults compared with controls (SMD: 0.50, 95% CI:0.09-0.92). Subgroup analyses showed significant effects of baseline cognition impairment (SMD: 9.80, 95% CI: 5.81-13.80), intervention duration > 12 weeks (SMD: 2.85, 95% CI: 0.73-4.96), aerobic exercise (SMD: 0.74, CI: 0.19-1.29), and countries other than the United States (SMD: 10.50, 95% CI: 7.08-13.92).

conclusionPhysical activity might have a general positive effect on the cognition of sedentary older adults. Intervention > 12 weeks and aerobic exercise can effectively delay their cognitive decline; however, more rigorous RCTs are needed to support our findings.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionExerciseAgedChinaCognitionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCognitioncognitive functionexercisemeta-analysisolder adultsphysical activitysedentary lifestyle

Identifiers

PMID35431253
PMCPMC9198743
OpenAlexW4223436930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.